Distribution of the Strains of Multidrug-resistant, Extensively Drug-resistant, and Pandrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Burn Patients
Hajieh Ghasemian Safaei1, Sharareh Moghim1, Bahram Nasr Isfahani1, Hossein Fazeli1, Farkhondeh Poursina1, Sima Yadegari2, Pourya Nasirmoghadas1, Seyed Abolfazl Hosseininassab Nodoushan1
1 Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Imammosa Kazem Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Infectious Disease Research, Imammosa Kazem Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
|Date of Web Publication||27-Jun-2017|
Hajieh Ghasemian Safaei
Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic and Gram-negative pathogen that is used as the most important factor in burn wound infections, and due to the rapid acquisition of multidrug resistance (MDR), it causes high mortality rates in these sectors. Thus, diagnosis and assessment of antibiotic resistance patterns are very important in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate antibiotic resistance pattern and determining P. aeruginosa MDR. Materials and Methods: In this study, phenotypic, biochemical, and polymerase chain reaction tests were used to identify P. aeruginosa from 120 wound burn samples that 96 samples were detected to P. aeruginosa species. In the next step, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute standard guidelines, antibiogram test was performed by disk diffusion method for amikacin, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, gentamicin, cefepime, aztreonam, meropenem, colistin, ceftazidime, and piperacillin-tazobactam antibiotics. Antibiotic data were analyzed by WHONET software; finally, the rate of antibiotic resistance and MDR strains was determined. Results: The highest antibiotic resistance belonged to amikacin (94.8%) and norfloxacin (90.6%); in contrast, colistin (8.3%) had the lowest and the MDR strains were MDR (95.8%) and extensively drug resistance (XDR) (87.5%). Conclusion: In this study, there was MDR with an alarming rate including MDR (95.8%), XDR (87.5%), and pan-drug resistance (0%). As a result, given antibiotics to patients should be controlled by the antibiogram results to avoid increasing MDR strains.
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance, burn, Iran, multidrug resistant, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
|How to cite this article:|
Safaei HG, Moghim S, Isfahani BN, Fazeli H, Poursina F, Yadegari S, Nasirmoghadas P, Nodoushan SA. Distribution of the Strains of Multidrug-resistant, Extensively Drug-resistant, and Pandrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Burn Patients. Adv Biomed Res 2017;6:74
|How to cite this URL:|
Safaei HG, Moghim S, Isfahani BN, Fazeli H, Poursina F, Yadegari S, Nasirmoghadas P, Nodoushan SA. Distribution of the Strains of Multidrug-resistant, Extensively Drug-resistant, and Pandrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Burn Patients. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Oct 19];6:74. Available from: https://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2017/6/1/74/209048
| Introduction|| |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic and Gram-negative bacteria found in various environments and hosts such as water, soil, plants, animal, and human beings., It has a very large genome that causes more complex features than other bacteria. Because of high versatility with the host and different virulence factors such as exotoxin, elastase, rhamnolipid, pyocyanin, pyochelin, and lectin. P. aeruginosa is considered as one of the most dangerous bacteria in the world.,, The bacteria are colonized in the human body in wet areas such as anus, armpits, ears, nose, and throat mucosa. The prevalence of colonization in healthy people is very low, but it is increased in hospitalized patients, especially those treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics., Nowadays, nosocomial infections and subsequent antibiotic resistance are one of the serious problems at a global level, so that each year, a large number of patients involved with these infections and lose their lives.,P. aeruginosa is one of the most common bacteria in nosocomial infections, especially in burn units. Burn patients, because of losing the skin barrier, are very vulnerable to infection., It can be transmitted through the flora contamination be in touch with different surfaces in hospitals, such as equipment, disinfectant solutions, nurse's hands, and may spread among other patients ., The ability to use multiple mechanisms, including decreased outer membrane permeability, expression of efflux pump, produces antibiotic degradative enzymes, alginate production and transfer of resistance genes, the bacteria has enabled to show a high level of resistance to the most used antibiotics ., Multidrug resistance (MDR) to antibiotics against Pseudomonas is a common and growing problem in most hospitals as P. aeruginosa of MDR is responsible for 4%–60% of nosocomial infections in different parts of the world., The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics such as ceftazidime in the burn ward and Intensive Care Units (ICUs) by creating a selective pressure on bacteria likely increases emergence of multidrug-resistant strains including MDR, extensively drug-resistance (XDR), and even pan-drug resistance (PDR). The presence of these strains in the burn wards has become a key issue in infection control. Due to increasing resistance to antibiotics, treatment of these infections has become constantly more complicated and difficult and will follow problems such as increased illness, higher mortality rate, and economic impacts. Hence, for proper treatment, detection of MDR strains is essential.,,, With regard to this issue, study of antibiotic resistance and trying to control this problem by new methods of treatment is very important. In this study, we tried to survey the resistance of P. aeruginosa isolated from burn unit and to determine MDR patterns of bacteria.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This study was conducted on 120 wounds' samples belong to burn patients with suspected colonies of P. aeruginosa collected from the Microbiology Laboratory between January 2015 and June 2015 at Imam Musa Kazim Burn Hospital of Isfahan, Iran. The first step was the use of diagnostic tests including Gram-staining, oxidase, triple sugar iron, sulfide-indole motility, oxidative fermentative (OF), gelatinase, specific medium cetrimide, and incubation at 42°C. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of toxA was done with specific primer for the confirmation of phenotypic detection. ToxA primer was used in the experiment consists of 5-CGACCTCTGGAACGAATGC-3 and 5-AGCAGGCACAACACCTTGC-3.
Preparation of genomic DNA
For DNA extraction, two or three colonies of fresh culture of P. aeruginosa were dissolved in 300 ml of lysis buffer containing (Tris 100 mmol, Nacl 50 mmol, and EDTA 25 mmol, pH = 7.5) completely. Subsequently, suspension was boiled at 95°C for 10 min. Equal volumes of phenol and chloroform (25:24, pH = 7.5) were added, mixed thoroughly, and centrifuged at 9000 g for 5 min. Aqueous–viscous supernatant was transformed to a fresh microtube; phenol/chloroform (25:24) was added again and centrifuged at 9000 g for 5 min. To DNA precipitation, 600 μl of cold pure ethanol (Merck, Germany) was added and centrifuged at 13,000 g (4°C, 20 min). Obtained DNA after washing with 70% ethanol was stored at –20°C.
PCR for toxA (396 bp) amplification includes the following:
Each reaction was made in 20 μl volume to perform PCR which, respectively, include 10 μl the commercial master mix (containing Taq DNA polymerase, dNTPs, and MgCl2) (Ampliqon Danmark), 1 μl of each primer (Metabion, Germany), 2 μl DNA sample, and 6 μl distilled water that was added to 0.2 microtube. Amplification was performed for 35 cycles as: initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, primer annealing at 60°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were visualized on 1% agarose gel stained with DNA green viewer dye [Figure 1]. In this experiment, the standard strains of P. aeruginosa ATCC27853 as a positive control and sterile water were used to control blank. Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates was ascertained by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method according to the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. For antibiogram stages, first to obtain a single colony, samples were cultured on blood agar by streak plate method. In the next step, a freshly prepared bacterial suspension adjusted to 0.5 McFarland unit (1.5 × 107 cells) was streaked for confluent growth on Mueller-Hinton agar plate using a swab, and discs were conducted to a distance of 2 cm from each antibiotic. In this study, following antibiotic disks were used: ciprofloxacin (5 μg), amikacin (30 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), cefepime (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam, and colistin (10 μg). The mentioned antibiotics were provided from the two companies of Padtan Teb, Iran, and Mast, England.
|Figure 1: Gel image of representative polymerase chain reaction of toxA gene. Line 1 ladder (1000 bp), line 2–5 clinical specimens, line 6 positive control, line 7 negative|
Click here to view
Enterococcus faecalis ATCC29212 using trimetoprima sulfametoxazol disk was used to control the quality of Mueller-Hinton agar, and P. aeruginosa ATCC27853 was used for antibiotic discs. The obtained results indicated the good qualities of medium and antibiotic discs. Comparing the Iranian and foreign discs showed very little difference. However, the results of antibiotic resistance were extracted according to data from quality control. After incubation at 37°C for 18–24 h, the diameter around each disk was measured using the ruler and the results were analyzed by WHONET software. Determining the level of antibiotic resistance, MDR strains were found. According to the CLSI, strains are resistant to antibiotic if at least a factor of 3 or more different classes were MDR. Resistance to a factor of all classes except one or two class defined as XDR and strains that were resistant to all antibiotic classes as PDR.
| Results|| |
The patients were including 3rd degree of burning. Of 96 samples that were detected as P. aeruginosa, there was more resistant to amikacin (%94.8) and norfloxacin (90.6%) and the least resistance was related to colistin (8.3%). Resistance to other discs contained ciprofloxacin 89.6%, aztreonam 87.5%, meropenem 88.5%, ceftazidime 60.4%, gentamicin %82.3, cefepime 80.2%, and piperacillin-tazobactam 80.2% [Figure 2].
According to the survey of MDR, 95.8% of samples were MDR, 87.5% were XDR, and no PDR were detected [Table 1].
| Discussion|| |
Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae are the most common bacteria involved in nosocomial infections. Of these, P. aeruginosa is very important in burn ward.,, In many reports of burn, this bacteria is considered as the most common cause of hospital infections.,,, One of the main problems associated with P. aeruginosa is rapid acquisition of MDR, which leads to high morbidity and mortality and treatment complexity, especially in burn centers. Several mechanisms have been known for antibiotic resistance, for example, production of enzymes cephalosporinase (due to the presence of AmpC gene), production of beta-lactamase enzymes, reducing the permeability of the outer membranepurine reduction (OprD), synthesis of enzymes such as phosphorylation transferase and acetyl transferase (resistance to aminoglycosides), changes in topoisomerase II and IV (quinolone-resistance) and efflux pumps.,, Today, the MDR strains of P. aeruginosa are increasing around the world. More than 10% of P. aeruginosa strains in worldwide are MDR.,, Several studies were conducted in connection with MDR in Iran which for example can be mentioned as the following. In a study by Mirsalehian et al., in 2007 (Tehran), 87.05% of the cases were MDR. In addition, in the studies by Japoni et al. from Southern Iran and Ranjbar et al. from Tehran, 73% and 100% of MDR have been reported, respectively., In our study, 95.8% of the isolates were MDR that 87.5% of them identified as XDR. It can be concluded from comparing the studies in Iran with other countries such as Korea, Italy, Greece, Poland, Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, India, Bulgaria, and Spain that the rate of MDR in different parts of the world is higher than Iran.,,,,,,,,,, For example, MDR has been reported in Korea as 50%, Turkey 60%, Egypt 36%, Pakistan 29.24%, Bulgaria 49.8%, Spain 70%, and India 36.2%, which is different from our study and some other reports in Iran. These statistics clearly indicate that the range of effective antibiotics in the treatment of P. aeruginosa in burn infections is being extremely limited in Iran and particularly in Isfahan that showed the high rates of MDR. For example, Fazli et al. in 2008 examined the samples of respiratory tract, cerebrospinal fluid, stool, burn wounds, etc., that were collected from five treatment hospitals in Isfahan. The rate of MDR was reported as 71.54% in the all samples and it was 100% in burn wounds. These results were similar to Rahimzadeh et al.'s study in 2012 on four treatment hospitals in Isfahan. In this study, MDR of burn wounds strains was 100%. Golshani et al. in 2013 collected and investigated the clinical samples including urine, respiratory, blood, wound infection, swabs, and nasal mucosa from various hospitals of the province. In this study, 63% of all cases were MDR. Comparing the mentioned statistics with MDR, rate of 95.8% in our study revealed a high level of MDR in P. aeruginosa in the most hospitals of Isfahan, with a very higher rate in the burn wound strains. Fortunately, in our study, we did not find PDR strains; however, in the study of Fazeli et al., samples related to the ICU were examined which 50% of strains were PDR resistant. The reason for this was overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. This can be a great alarm to burn unit strains of Imam Musa Kazim Hospital to become PDR strains. Hence, to avoid this, applying strict monitoring for the use of antibiotics is required. In a number of previous studies, the treatment of MDR strains recommended by carbapenems and aztreonam; however, in our study, we faced with 90% resistance to meropenem and aztreonam. Resistance to meropenem was reported in various studies, such as Altoparlak et al. from Turkey as 32.5%, Rahimi (Arak) 35%, Mirsalehian (Tehran) 66%, and Fazeli (Isfahan) 62.1%. Resistance to aztreonam has also been shown in two recent studies as 90% and 69.7%, respectively.,,, Detection of these two antibiotics resistance and its comparison with our study indicates an increase in resistance to meropenem and high levels resistance to aztreonam. Hence, it seems that the use of these antibiotics in a burn unit of Imam Musa Kazim Hospital was not effective anymore. Among the examples of XDR, colistin was the only antibiotic that the majority of the samples were sensitive to it. Nevertheless, 8.3% of the samples were resistant to this antibiotic. In a study of Adabi et al. from Tehran which was conducted in 2015, resistance to colistin was 0%. In another study by Kumar and Srivastava in 2014 on P. aeruginosa samples isolated from the patients with the age of 10–70 years, resistance to colistin was reported 3%. We have observed an increased resistance to colistin by examining the data. Of course, evaluating more samples can be helpful in confirming this topic. In the present study, colistin was the most effective antibiotic which can be used in burn wounds to fight infection of P. aeruginosa; however, unfortunately, the increasing resistance can expand concerns about the treatment of this disease. It should be noted that susceptibility in burn samples was significantly different from other studies that have been conducted on the samples from a nonburn unit. For example, in the study of Rahimi et al. (2012), P. aeruginosa was isolated from different parts including urine, sputum, and wound. Susceptibility pattern of the samples was shown for gentamicin 14%, ceftazidime 23%, ciprofloxacin 15%, meropenem 35%, and amikacin 9%. In addition, the study of Shawar et al. was performed on samples of patients with cystic fibrosis. Resistance was determined to amikacin 13.1%, gentamicin 19.3%, aztreonam 11.9%, ceftazidime 11.1%, and ciprofloxacin 20.7%. By comparing the pattern of antibiotic resistance in the mentioned studies and our study, we can conclude that resistance in burn unit is much higher than the others. In addition, there is concern that the transition to the other sides of the burn units causes the spread of resistance in these sectors. Although, in these studies, there was found no PDR strains, resistance rate of 87.5% for XDR suggests that the emergence of PDR strains will be very likely in future, so dramatic increase in antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa in this study such as 8.3% resistance to colistin and 95.8% of MDR should be taken as a serious warning. Therefore, measures such as continuous sterilization of hospital surfaces, increasing awareness of health-care workers, antibiogram tests before prescribing medication, and the use of new diagnostic and therapeutic methods for screening patients are recommended with a major emphasis.
| Conclusion|| |
In this study, there was MDR with an alarming rate including MDR (95.8%), XDR (87.5%), and pan-drug resistance (0%). As a result, given antibiotics to patients should be controlled by the antibiogram results to avoid increasing MDR strains.
We would like to express our thanks to Mrs. Riyahi and Mrs. Beigi for their excellent assistance. This research was supported by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Grant No. 394656.
Financial support and sponsorship
This study was supported by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Grant No. 394656.
Conflicts of interest
There are no confl icts of interest.
| References|| |
Stover CK, Pham XQ, Erwin AL, Mizoguchi SD, Warrener P, Hickey MJ, et al.
Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 2000;406:959-64.
Balasubramanian D, Schneper L, Kumari H, Mathee K. A dynamic and intricate regulatory network determines Pseudomonas aeruginosa
virulence. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:1-20.
Rossolini GM, Mantengoli E. Treatment and control of severe infections caused by multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005;11 Suppl 4:17-32.
Jimenez PN, Koch G, Thompson JA, Xavier KB, Cool RH, Quax WJ. The multiple signaling systems regulating virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2012;76:46-65.
Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, Costerton JW, Davies DG. Pseudomonas aeruginosa
displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol 2002;184:1140-54.
Oliver A, Cantón R, Campo P, Baquero F, Blázquez J. High frequency of hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa
in cystic fibrosis lung infection. Science 2000;288:1251-4.
Moghoofei M, Fazeli H, Poursina F, Nasr Esfahani B, Moghim S, Vaez H, et al.
Morphological and bactericidal effects of amikacin, meropenem and imipenem on Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. Jundishapur J Microbiol 2015;8:e25250.
Livermore DM. Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
: Our worst nightmare? Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:634-40.
Maleknezhad P, Aligholi M, Moosavi S. Study of pseudomonas aeroginosa resistance to penicillines, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. Tehran Univ Med J TUMS Publ 1998;56:23-8.
Japoni A, Alborzi A, Kalani M, Nasiri J, Hayati M, Farshad S. Susceptibility patterns and cross-resistance of antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
isolated from burn patients in the South of Iran. Burns 2006;32:343-7.
Nikokar I, Tishayar A, Flakiyan Z, Alijani K, Rehana-Banisaeed S, Hossinpour M, et al.
Antibiotic resistance and frequency of class 1 integrons among Pseudomonas aeruginosa
, isolated from burn patients in Guilan, Iran. Iran J Microbiol 2013;5:36-41.
Driscoll JA, Brody SL, Kollef MH. The epidemiology, pathogenesis and treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
infections. Drugs 2007;67:351-68.
Morales E, Cots F, Sala M, Comas M, Belvis F, Riu M, et al
. Hospital costs of nosocomial multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
acquisition. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:1.
Biswal I, Arora BS, Kasana D, Neetushree. Incidence of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
isolated from burn patients and environment of teaching institution. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:DC26-9.
Douglas MW, Mulholland K, Denyer V, Gottlieb T. Multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
outbreak in a burns unit – An infection control study. Burns 2001;27:131-5.
Vaez H, Faghri J, Isfahani BN, Moghim S, Yadegari S, Fazeli H, et al.
Efflux pump regulatory genes mutations in multidrug resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa
isolated from wound infections in Isfahan hospitals. Adv Biomed Res 2014;3:117.
Pillar CM, Hobden JA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa
exotoxin A and keratitis in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1437-44.
Mohammadimehr M, Feizabadi M, Bahadori A. Antibiotic resistance pattern of Gram negative bacilli caused nosocomial infections in ICUs in khanevadeh and golestan hospital in Tehran-2007. Ann Mil Health Sci Res 2011;8:283-90.
Lari AR, Alaghehbandan R, Nikui R. Epidemiological study of 3341 burns patients during three years in Tehran, Iran. Burns 2000;26:49-53.
Zolfaghari M, Motlagh M, Aghaiee S, Heidarpoor A. Bacterial elements affecting infections after burn in nequiee-hedaiati Burn hospital, Ghom. J Ghom Univ Med Sci 2011;5:3.
Agnihotri N, Gupta V, Joshi RM. Aerobic bacterial isolates from burn wound infections and their antibiograms – A five-year study. Burns 2004;30:241-3.
Mehta M, Dutta P, Gupta V. Bacterial isolates from burn wound infections and their antibiograms: A eight-year study. Indian J Plast Surg 2007;40:25. [Full text]
Poole K. Efflux-mediated resistance to fluoroquinolones in Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:2233-41.
Van Bambeke F, Balzi E, Tulkens PM. Antibiotic efflux pumps. Biochem Pharmacol 2000;60:457-70.
Strateva T, Ouzounova-Raykova V, Markova B, Todorova A, Marteva-Proevska Y, Mitov I. Problematic clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
from the university hospitals in Sofia, Bulgaria: Current status of antimicrobial resistance and prevailing resistance mechanisms. J Med Microbiol 2007;56(Pt 7):956-63.
Karlowsky JA, Jones ME, Thornsberry C, Evangelista AT, Yee YC, Sahm DF. Stable antimicrobial susceptibility rates for clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
from the 2001-2003 tracking resistance in the United States today surveillance studies. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40 Suppl 2:S89-98.
Mirsalehian A, Feizabadi M, Nakhjavani FA, Jabalameli F, Goli H, Kalantari N. Detection of VEB-1, OXA-10 and PER-1 genotypes in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa
strains isolated from burn patients. Burns 2010;36:70-4.
Ranjbar R, Owlia P, Saderi H, Mansouri S, Jonaidi-Jafari N, Izadi M, et al.
Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
strains isolated from burned patients hospitalized in a major burn center in Tehran, Iran. Acta Med Iran 2011;49:675-9.
Chayakulkeeree M, Junsriwong P, Keerasuntonpong A, Tribuddharat C, Thamlikitkul V. Epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Gram-negative bacilli at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, 2003. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2005;36:1503-9.
Kaushik R, Kumar S, Sharma R, Lal P. Bacteriology of burn wounds – The first three years in a new burn unit at the Medical College Chandigarh. Burns 2001;27:595-7.
Song W, Lee KM, Kang HJ, Shin DH, Kim DK. Microbiologic aspects of predominant bacteria isolated from the burn patients in Korea. Burns 2001;27:136-9.
Ozumba UC, Jiburum BC. Bacteriology of burn wounds in Enugu, Nigeria. Burns 2000;26:178-80.
Tsakris A, Vatopoulos AC, Tzouvelekis LS, Legakis NJ. Diversity of resistance phenotypes and plasmid analysis in multi-resistant 0:12 Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. Eur J Epidemiol 1992;8:865-70.
Gad GF, El-Domany RA, Zaki S, Ashour HM. Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
isolated from clinical and environmental samples in Minia, Egypt: Prevalence, antibiogram and resistance mechanisms. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:1010-7.
Ullah F, Malik SA, Ahmed J. Antimicrobial susceptibility and ESBL prevalence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
isolated from burn patients in the North West of Pakistan. Burns 2009;35:1020-5.
Peña C, Gómez-Zorrilla S, Oriol I, Tubau F, Dominguez MA, Pujol M, et al.
Impact of multidrug resistance on Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ventilator-associated pneumonia outcome: Predictors of early and crude mortality. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2013;32:413-20.
Fazeli H, Bafghi MF, Faghri J, Akbari R. Molecular study of PER and VEB genes is multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
isolated. J Kerman Univ Med Sci 2012;19:345-53.
Rahimzadeh Torabi L, Doudi M, Golshani Z. The frequency of blaIMP and blaVIM carbapenemase genes in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
in Isfahan medical centers. Med J Mashhad Univ Med Sci 2016;59:139-47.
Golshani ZA, Sharifzadeh VA, Ali. The prevalence of VEB1 beta-lactamase gene in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
isolated from nosocomial isolates with multi drug resistant. Sci Mag Yafte 2014;16:91-7. [Persian].
Fazeli H, Havaei SA, Solgi H, Shokri D, Motallebirad T. Pattern of antibiotic resistance in pesudomonas aeruginosa isolated from Intensive Care Unit, Isfahan, Iran. J Isfahan Med Sch 2013;31:232.
Altoparlak U, Aktas F, Celebi D, Ozkurt Z, Akcay MN. Prevalence of metallo-β-lactamase among Pseudomonas aeruginosa
and Acinetobacter baumannii
isolated from burn wounds and in vitro
activities of antibiotic combinations against these isolates. Burns 2005;31:707-10.
Rahimi B, Shojapour M, Sadeghi A, Pourbabayi AA. The study of the antibiotic resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Arak. Arak Med Univ J 2012;15:8-14.
Nakhjavani A. Prevalence of extended spectrum beta lactamases among strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
isolated from burn patients. Tehran Univ Med J TUMS Publ 2008;66:333-7.
Adabi M, Talebi Taher M, Arbabi L, Afshar M, Fathizadeh S, Minaeian S, et al
. Determination of antibiotic resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
strains isolated from patients with burn wounds. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci 2015;15:66-74.
Kumar R, Srivastava P. Detection and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
isolates in various clinical samples with special reference to metallo beta lactamase from a tertiary care hospital in Jaipur, India. Natl J Med Res 2014;4:128-31.
Shawar RM, MacLeod DL, Garber RL, Burns JL, Stapp JR, Clausen CR, et al.
Activities of tobramycin and six other antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:2877-80.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||A catchment-scale assessment of the sanitary condition of treated wastewater and river water based on fecal indicators and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp
| ||Liliana Serwecinska,Edyta Kiedrzynska,Marcin Kiedrzynski |
| ||Science of The Total Environment. 2021; 750: 142266 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Response regulator GacA and transcriptional activator RhlR proteins involved in biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are prospective targets for natural lead molecules: Computational modelling, molecular docking and dynamic simulation studies
| ||Sinosh Skariyachan,Roshini Ravishankar,Dharshini Gopal,Aditi G. Muddebihalkar,Akshay Uttarkar,Prinith Kaveramma Uluvangada Praveen,Vidya Niranjan |
| ||Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2020; 85: 104448 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Antimicrobials and Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria: A Risk to the Environment and to Public Health
| ||Liliana Serwecinska |
| ||Water. 2020; 12(12): 3313 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Study of antimicrobial and DNA cleavage property of biocompatible silver nanoparticles prepared by using Ficus carica L.
| ||M. Yasmin Begum,Yahya Alhamhoom,Aashis Roy |
| ||Materials Research Innovations. 2020; : 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Frequency of Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan
| ||Sundas Abbas,Asad Ullah Sabir,Noor Khalid,Sarah Sabir,Sana Khalid,Shawal Haseeb,Muhammad Numair Khan,Waqas M Ajmal,Faryal Azhar,M.Talha Saeed |
| ||Cureus. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes distribution in Pseudomonas species from livestock samples in Ibadan, Nigeria
| ||Olutayo Israel Falodun,Emmanuel Olugbenga Ikusika,Isaiah Baba Musa,Abolade A. Oyelade |
| ||Gene Reports. 2020; : 100950 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||CRISPR-dCas9-mediated knockdown of
, an essential gene in
| ||L. Xiang,F. Qi,L. Jiang,J. Tan,C. Deng,Z. Wei,S. Jin,G. Huang |
| ||Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Epidemiology and Mechanisms of Resistance of Extensively Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria
| ||Emily M. Eichenberger,Joshua T. Thaden |
| ||Antibiotics. 2019; 8(2): 37 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections
| ||Yu-Xuan Ma,Chen-Yu Wang,Yuan-Yuan Li,Jing Li,Qian-Qian Wan,Ji-Hua Chen,Franklin R. Tay,Li-Na Niu |
| ||Advanced Science. 2019; : 1901872 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Study of Mutation in LasR and PqsR Genes in Extremely Drug Resistant and Multidrug Resistant Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Burn Wound Infection
| ||Seyed Abolfazl Hosseininasab Nodoushan,Sharareh Moghim,Nasrin Mirzaei,Hajieh Ghasemian Safaei |
| ||Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2019; In Press(In Press) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Distribution of Ambler Class A ?-lactamase Genes and Evaluation of Resistance Patterns in Multi-Drug and Extensively-Drug Resistant P. aeruginosa Clinical Isolates
| ||Seyed Amin Enayatzadeh meymandi,Laleh Babaeekhou,Maryam Ghane |
| ||Medical Laboratory Journal. 2019; 13(5): 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||High incidence of type III secretion system associated virulence factors (exoenzymes) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from Iranian burn patients
| ||Ramin Khodayary,Iraj Nikokar,Mohammad Reza Mobayen,Farhad Afrasiabi,Afshin Araghian,Ali Elmi,Meisam Moradzadeh |
| ||BMC Research Notes. 2019; 12(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Waste-grass-mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and evaluation of their anticancer, antifungal and antibacterial activity
| ||Mehrdad Khatami,Iraj Sharifi,Marcos A. L. Nobre,Niloofar Zafarnia,Mohammad R. Aflatoonian |
| ||Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews. 2018; 11(2): 125 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Phenotypic and molecular detection of metallo-▀-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with burns in Tehran, Iran
| ||Akram Azimi,Amir Peymani,Parham Kianoush Pour |
| ||Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. 2018; 51(5): 610 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Bio-guided Purification and Mass Spectrometry Characterisation Exploring the Lysozyme-like Protein from Enterococcus lactis Q1, an Unusual Marine Bacterial Strain
| ||Olfa Ben Bra´ek,Slim Smaoui,Yannick Fleury,Stefano Morandi,Khaled Hani,Taoufik Ghrairi |
| ||Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Short Proline-Rich Lipopeptide Potentiates Minocycline and Rifampin against Multidrug- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
| ||Ronald Domalaon,Yaroslav Sanchak,Linet Cherono Koskei,Yinfeng Lyu,George G. Zhanel,Gilbert Arthur,Frank Schweizer |
| ||Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2018; 62(4): e02374-17 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Molecular characterization of clinical and environmental Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in a burn center
| ||Pezhman Karami,Parviz Mohajeri,Rasool yousefi mashouf,Manoochehr Karami,Mojtaba Hedayat Yaghoobi,Dara Dastan,Mohammad Yousef Alikhani |
| ||Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|