Users Online: 4689
Home Print this page Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Ahead of Print Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Adv Biomed Res 2019,  8:65

Improvement of Soluble Production of Reteplase in Escherichia Coli by Optimization of Chemical Chaperones in Lysis Buffer


Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Isfahan Pharmaceutical Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Submission14-Oct-2018
Date of Acceptance09-Jul-2019
Date of Web Publication31-Oct-2019

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Hamid Mir Mohammad Sadeghi
Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Isfahan Pharmaceutical Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_212_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Reteplase is a nonglycosylated derivative of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, a thrombolytic agent, which can be easily expressed in Escherichia coli. However, overexpression of reteplase in E. coli usually leads to accumulation of insoluble and inactive aggregates and inclusion bodies. In the present study, we aimed to optimize chemical additives of lysis buffer to avoid the initial aggregation and formation of inclusion bodies of reteplase at cell disruption step. Materials and Methods: After protein expression in E. coli BL21 (DE3), the bacterial cells were disrupted in different lysis buffers using microsmashing. Eleven chemical additives at two concentration levels were combined based on a Plackett–Burman design to prepare 12 different lysis buffers used at cell disruption stage. Then, three additives with the most positive effect on improvement of solubility of reteplase were chosen and used for the second screening based on Box–Behnken model. Results: The primary screening results showed that among 11 additives, arginine, K2PO4,and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) had the most positive effect on solubility of reteplase. Our final results based on 14 runs of Box–Behnken design showed that the optimum buffer additive condition is 0.005 mg/ml CTAB, 0.065 mg/ml arginine, and 0.026 mg/ml K2PO4. Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis and Western blotting of soluble and total fraction of samples confirmed that these additives significantly improved soluble production of reteplase compared with control. Conclusion: Our study indicates that the application of chemical additives in cell lysis can improve the solubility of reteplase. Further studies are still required to understand the exact mechanism of chemical additives as a chemical chaperone during cell lysis.

Keywords: Cell lysis, chemical chaperone, optimization, reteplase


How to cite this article:
Fazeli B, Akbari V, Barkhordari A, Mir Mohammad Sadeghi H. Improvement of Soluble Production of Reteplase in Escherichia Coli by Optimization of Chemical Chaperones in Lysis Buffer. Adv Biomed Res 2019;8:65

How to cite this URL:
Fazeli B, Akbari V, Barkhordari A, Mir Mohammad Sadeghi H. Improvement of Soluble Production of Reteplase in Escherichia Coli by Optimization of Chemical Chaperones in Lysis Buffer. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 13];8:65. Available from: http://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2019/8/1/65/270135




  Introduction Top


Tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) is a proteolytic enzyme which can lead to the lysis of blood clots (i.e., thrombolysis) through the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), t-PA produced by recombinant DNA technology, is mainly used for the treatment of embolic or thrombotic stroke.[1],[2],[3],[4] One of the most challenging factors in the production of this thrombolytic agent is its glycosylation which makes it difficult to produce the protein in prokaryotic systems (e.g.,  Escherichia More Details coli). However, other derivatives of rt-PA such as reteplase with no glycosylated domain can be easily expressed in E. coli. There are some reports on successful expression of reteplase in E. coli,[5],[6] although overexpression of protein usually leads to accumulation of insoluble and inactive aggregates and inclusion bodies.[7] There are different approaches for improvement of soluble expression of proteins in E. coli including construction of recombinant fusion proteins such as maltose-binding protein,[8],[9],[10] alternative expression approaches such as the use of cell-free extracts for expression of protein[11] or baculovirus expression system,[12] the use of carboxyl- or amino-terminal deletion mutants,[13] co-expression of molecular chaperone proteins with the target protein,[14] and modification of culture conditions such as reduction of culture temperature[15] Furthermore, structural proteomic approaches such as the use of soluble derivative of a protein[16] or deletion of flexible regions or residues that interfere with protein solubility[17] can be applied to enhance the expression of soluble protein in some instances. Refolding of solubilized inclusion bodies can be also used to recover soluble protein.[18] The mentioned approaches involve additional time, effort, and cost and do not always succeed. There is a conventional belief that it may not be worth attempting to solubilize proteins from inclusion bodies. Some researchers hypothesized that the main fraction of protein was firstly expressed as a soluble protein and accumulates as insoluble aggregates after cell lysis.[19] They proposed that adjustment of cell lysis buffer conditions such as pH, ionic strength, and presence of chemical additives could result in increase of soluble protein production. In the present study, we aimed to optimize chemical additives of lysis buffer to avoid the initial aggregation of reteplase at cell disruption step.


  Materials and Methods Top


Expression of reteplase

E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells were made competent using CaCl2 treatment, and recombinant plasmid (pDset-527-Ret) was introduced into competent cells by heat shock method. A single recombinant colony was inoculated into 50 ml Luria-Bertani (LB) broth and incubated at 37°C overnight. This culture was used to inoculate 500 ml of fresh LB broth and incubated at 37°C and 180 rpm until reach to OD600 of 0.4–0.6. Then, protein expression was induced by addition of 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside, and the culture was incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Finally, the culture was aliquoted in 1 ml volumes and centrifuged at 5000 g for 5 min, and the bacterial pellet was stored at −70°C for further analysis.

Design of experiments

The different lysis buffers and the concentration of 11 additives [Table 1] in each buffer have been designed by Design-Expert software (version 8.0.7.1, Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, USA). A Plackett–Burman design with 11 factors and 12 runs [Table 2] was used to choose three most important factors. Based on Box–Behnken model, these three factors at three levels were combined [Table 3].
Table 1: Eleven additives and their maximum and minimum concentrations used for primary screen

Click here to view
Table 2: Plackett–Burman design of 11 cell lysis buffer additives

Click here to view
Table 3: Box–Behnken experimental design of three additives at three levels for preparation of lysis buffers

Click here to view


Preparation of different lysis buffers

The standard lysis buffer consisted of 500 mM NaCl, 10% w/v glycerol, 0.025% w/v NaAzide, 10 mM MgCl2, and 25 Mm Tris (pH 8). This standard buffer was used for preparation of all different lysis buffers used in this study. The different additives were added to this standard buffer, and after dissolving, the pH was adjusted to eight.

Cell disruption

Five hundred microliters of different lysis buffers was added to the bacterial pellet. After resuspending, the samples were subjected to cell lysis using a Micro Smash MS-100 (Tomy, Japan). To do this, an appropriate amount of glass beads (0.1 mm) was added to cell suspension and microsmashed at 4500 rpm for 1 min and then kept on ice for 2 min; this procedure was repeated five times. The sample was centrifuged at 7500 g for 10 min to separate the soluble and insoluble fractions. The obtained samples were stored at −70°C for further analysis.

Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Western blotting, and biological activity

The same amount (20 μl) of the protein samples was loaded into each sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) well and separated by applying an electric field (80 V for 5% gel and 150 V for 12% gel). Then, the gel was subjected to Coomassie staining and destaining to visualize protein bands. To confirm protein expression and estimate size of expressed protein, the Western blotting technique was used. After electrophoresis, separated proteins by SDS-PAGE were transferred from the gel to a nitrocellulose paper. Nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation of the membrane in 3% skim milk overnight. Then, the paper was incubated with Anti-6X His tag (HRP) antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Abcam, USA, 1:10,000) at room temperature for 2 h. The paper was washed three times, and the blots were visualized via incubation with a chromogenic substrate, 3,3'-diaminobenzidine.

The biological activity of obtained protein was evaluated using AssaySense Human tPA Chromogenic Activity Kit (Assaypro, USA) as described previously.[19] The standard reteplase (Retelies®) and the buffer were used as a positive control and a negative control, respectively.


  Results Top


Primary screening of chemical additives

Eleven different additives that had been previously proven to increase the solubility of recombinant proteins at cell lysis step and avoid initial aggregation of the expressed protein were chosen including L-arginine, K2 PO4, xylitol, CuCl2, trehalose, sodium selenite, proline, mannitol, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), sodium citrate, and glycine betaine. Maximum and minimum concentrations of each additive [Table 1] were selected based on the previous investigations.[19] To primary screen these additives, a Plackett–Burman design with 12 runs [Table 2] was applied. These lysis buffers were used at cell disruption stage, and after centrifugation, soluble and total protein fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE [Figure 1]. The gels were analyzed by TL120 software (Nonlinear Inc, Durham NC, USA) to estimate soluble protein concentrations in each run, and then, the results were analyzed by Design-Expert software. It was shown that three best additives for improvement of reteplase solubility during cell lysis were L-arginine, CTAB, and K2 PO4.
Figure 1: Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of soluble (s) and total (t) fractions from 1 to 12 runs after cell disruption using lysis buffer proposed by Plackett–Burman design. The arrows indicate reteplase

Click here to view


Secondary screening of chemical additives

A Box–Behnken design gave 12 runs with duplicates at center points. As a result, a total of 14 runs were performed [Table 3]. These lysis buffers were used at cell disruption stage, and after centrifugation, concentrations of protein in soluble and total protein fractions were determined by SDS-PAGE [Figure 2]. Based on SDS-PAGE analysis, the optimum lysis buffer was determined as for 0.065 mg/ml L-arginine, CTAB, and 0.026 mg/ml K2 PO4. Western blotting analysis also confirmed that these additives significantly improved soluble production of reteplase compared with control [Figure 3] and [Figure 4]. Biological activity analysis revealed that obtained soluble reteplase had a specific activity of 0.42 IU per 1 mg which was comparable with positive control.
Figure 2: Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of soluble (s) and total (t) fractions from 1 to 12 runs after cell disruption using lysis buffer proposed by Box–Behnken design. The arrows indicate reteplase

Click here to view
Figure 3: Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of soluble (s) and total (t) fractions after cell disruption using optimum lysis buffer (1) and control lysis buffer (2). The arrow indicates reteplase

Click here to view
Figure 4: Western blot analysis soluble fraction after cell disruption using control lysis buffer (1) and optimum lysis buffer (2), and the arrow indicates reteplase

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The purpose of this study was to improve the soluble expression of reteplase in E. coli by adding different chemical chaperones at cell lysis stage. In the study performed by Leibly et al., the effect of 144 additive conditions for cell lysis on the enhancement of solubility of 41 target proteins expressed in E. coli was evaluated.[20] Based on their results, we used 11 of the best additives as chemical chaperone to increase the solubility of reteplase during cell lysis. These additives could be categorized into four groups: (1) additives that could act as a ligand being necessary for the maintenance of soluble conformation of protein such as CuCl2 and sodium selenite;[21],[22] (2) additives which could decrease protein–protein interactions or aggregations such as CTAB;[23] (3) additives which known as protein stabilizers such as arginine, xylitol, trehalose, proline, mannitol, and glycine betaine;[24],[25],[26],[27],[28] and (4) additives that could change the buffering capacity or ion strength of the solution such as K2 PO4 and sodium citrate.

Among 11 additives tested in this study, L-arginine, CTAB, and K2 PO4 were the best chemical additives which could significantly increase the solubility and stability of protein during cell disruption.

Arginine is an amino acid which widely used as an additive in formulation of many therapeutic proteins. It has been demonstrated that arginine could increase the stability and solubility of protein probably through inhibition of protein aggregation.[29] It was also reported that addition of arginine into growth medium could enhance soluble expression of proteins.[30] Furthermore, arginine could improve the recovery of soluble protein from inclusion bodies.[31] CTAB, a cationic surfactant, is an amphipathic molecule which could reduce the aggregation of protein and increase the protein stability during cell disruption. There are also some reports about the application of surfactants in protein refolding studies.[32] K2 PO4 can affect pH and ion strength of the lysis buffer and therefore influence the conformational stability of protein. Different types of buffers have various effects on solubility and stability of a protein even in the same pH.[33] Therefore, it is important to optimize the buffer condition for each individual protein.

Two main mechanisms, enhancement of protein stability at folded state and inhibition of protein aggregation, have been proposed for improvement of protein solubility by chemical additives at cell lysis stage. It has been demonstrated that proteins can be equilibrated between unfolded (higher energy state or ΔG) and folded (lower energy state or ΔG) forms. The lower energy required for unfolding of a protein, the more susceptibility of the protein to be in unfolded state. Stabilizing of protein by additive during lysis could increase the energy needed for unfolding of proteins.[20] Second, chemical additives can act as refolding aids and improve native folding of proteins.[34],[35] It was suggested that some of recombinant proteins exist in partially folded state in cytosol of bacteria, and when cell lysis taken place in the presence of additives or chemical chaperones, proteins could be in its fully and correct folded states.[36]

Although it was not the aim of the present study, addition of chemical additives in both the growth medium and cell lysis buffer could improve the overall production of soluble protein. Further studies are required to evaluate this idea and to understand the exact mechanism of chemical additives as a chemical chaperone during cell lysis.


  Conclusion Top


In this study, we tried to optimize the expression of reteplase in E. coli using chemical chaperones. We evaluated the effect of adding different additives with different concentrations at lysis stage. According to our observation, the best additives and their best concentration were as follows: 0.005 mg/ml for CTAB, 0.065 mg/ml for L-arginine, and 0.026 mg/ml for K2 PO4. The methodology explained in the present study could also be applied to optimize buffer conditions of other similar proteins.

Acknowledgment

We thank Mrs. Fatemeh Moazen for her excellent technical assistance.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was financially supported by the Research Council of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (No: 396813).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Glick B, Pasternak J. Mulecular Biotechnology: Principles and Application of Recombinant DNA. 2nd ed. Washington, D. C: ASM Press; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Vallejo LF, Rinas U. Strategies for the recovery of active proteins through refolding of bacterial inclusion body proteins. Microb Cell Fact 2004;3:11.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Pennica D, Holmes WE, Kohr WJ, Harkins RN, Vehar GA, Ward CA, et al. Cloning and expression of human tissue-type plasminogen activator cDNA in E. coli. Nature 1983;301:214-21.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Makrides SC. Strategies for achieving high-level expression of genes in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev 1996;60:512-38.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mandi N, Sundaram KR, Tandra SK, Bandyopadhyay S, Padmanabhan S. Asn and Asn: Critical residues forin vitro biological activity of reteplase. Adv Hematol 2010;2010:172484.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Youchun Z, Wang G, Yang K, Changkai Z. Cloning, expression, and renaturation studies of reteplase. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2003;13:989-92.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Khodabakhsh F, Dehghani Z, Zia MF, Rabbani M, Sadeghi HM. Cloning and expression of functional reteplase in Escherichia coli TOP10. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol 2013;5:168-75.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Hammarström M, Hellgren N, van Den Berg S, Berglund H, Härd T. Rapid screening for improved solubility of small human proteins produced as fusion proteins in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci 2002;11:313-21.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kapust RB, Waugh DS. Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein is uncommonly effective at promoting the solubility of polypeptides to which it is fused. Protein Sci 1999;8:1668-74.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Hewitt SN, Choi R, Kelley A, Crowther GJ, Napuli AJ, Van Voorhis WC. Expression of proteins in Escherichia coli as fusions with maltose-binding protein to rescue non-expressed targets in a high-throughput protein-expression and purification pipeline. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2011;67:1006-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Spirin AS, Baranov VI, Ryabova LA, Ovodov SY, Alakhov YB. A continuous cell-free translation system capable of producing polypeptides in high yield. Science 1988;242:1162-4.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Miller LK. Baculoviruses for foreign gene expression in insect cells. Biotechnology 1988;10:457-65.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Gräslund S, Sagemark J, Berglund H, Dahlgren LG, Flores A, Hammarström M, et al. The use of systematic N- and C-terminal deletions to promote production and structural studies of recombinant proteins. Protein Expr Purif 2008;58:210-21.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Schlieker C, Bukau B, Mogk A. Prevention and reversion of protein aggregation by molecular chaperones in the E. coli cytosol: Implications for their applicability in biotechnology. J Biotechnol 2002;96:13-21.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Qing G, Ma LC, Khorchid A, Swapna GV, Mal TK, Takayama MM, et al. Cold-shock induced high-yield protein production in Escherichia coli. Nat Biotechnol 2004;22:877-82.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Savchenko A, Yee A, Khachatryan A, Skarina T, Evdokimova E, Pavlova M, et al. Strategies for structural proteomics of prokaryotes: Quantifying the advantages of studying orthologous proteins and of using both NMR and X-ray crystallography approaches. Proteins 2003;50:392-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Derewenda ZS. The use of recombinant methods and molecular engineering in protein crystallization. Methods 2004;34:354-63.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Buchner J, Pastan I, Brinkmann U. A method for increasing the yield of properly folded recombinant fusion proteins: Single-chain immunotoxins from renaturation of bacterial inclusion bodies. Anal Biochem 1992;205:263-70.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Shafiee F, Moazen F, Rabbani M, Mir Mohammad Sadeghi H. Optimization of the expression of reteplase in Escherichia coli TOP10 using arabinose promoter. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod 2015;10:e16676.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Leibly DJ, Nguyen TN, Kao LT, Hewitt SN, Barrett LK, Van Voorhis WC. Stabilizing additives added during cell lysis aid in the solubilization of recombinant proteins. PLoS One 2012;7:e52482.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Merchant SS, Allen MD, Kropat J, Moseley JL, Long JC, Tottey S, et al. Between a rock and a hard place: Trace element nutrition in Chlamydomonas. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1763:578-94.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Dokmanić I, Sikić M, Tomić S. Metals in proteins: Correlation between the metal-ion type, coordination number and the amino-acid residues involved in the coordination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2008;64:257-63.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Lawal OS. Kosmotropes and chaotropes as they affect functionality of a protein isolate. Food Chem 2006;95:101-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Golovanov AP, Hautbergue GM, Wilson SA, Lian LY. A simple method for improving protein solubility and long-term stability. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:8933-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ignatova Z, Gierasch LM. Inhibition of protein aggregationin vitro andin vivo by a natural osmoprotectant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:13357-61.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Expert-Bezançon N, Rabilloud T, Vuillard L, Goldberg ME. Physical-chemical features of non-detergent sulfobetaines active as protein-folding helpers. Biophys Chem 2003;100:469-79.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Rishi V, Anjum F, Ahmad F, Pfeil W. Role of non-compatible osmolytes in the stabilization of proteins during heat stress. Biochem J 1998;329(Pt 1):137-43.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Tiwari A, Bhat R. Stabilization of yeast hexokinase A by polyol osmolytes: Correlation with the physicochemical properties of aqueous solutions. Biophys Chem 2006;124:90-9.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Ghosh R, Sharma S, Chattopadhyay K. Effect of arginine on protein aggregation studied by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and other biophysical methods. Biochemistry 2009;48:1135-43.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Prasad S, Khadatare PB, Roy I. Effect of chemical chaperones in improving the solubility of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011;77:4603-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Wu B, Nemeth JF, Janecki DJ, Jones B, Obmolova G, Malia TJ, et al. Expression, refolding and purification of a human interleukin-17A variant. Cytokine 2011;53:107-14.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Noritomi H, Kato Y, Kato S. Efficient protein refolding using surfactants at high final protein concentration. J Surf Eng Mater Adv Technol 2014;4:9-13.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Chen J, Liu Y, Wang Y, Ding H, Su Z. Different effects of L-arginine on protein refolding: Suppressing aggregates of hydrophobic interaction, not covalent binding. Biotechnol Prog 2008;24:1365-72.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Abbasian SS, Soufian S, Ghaznavi-Rad E, Abtahi H. High level activity of recombinant lysostaphin after computer simulation and additive-based refolding. Int J Pept Res Ther 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10989-018-9769-7 Fujita K, Nakano R, Nakaba R, Nakamura N, Ohno H. Hydrated ionic liquids enable both solubilisation and refolding of aggregated concanavalin A. Chem Commun (Camb) 2019;55:3578-81.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Bandyopadhyay A, Saxena K, Kasturia N, Dalal V, Bhatt N, Rajkumar A, et al. Chemical chaperones assist intracellular folding to buffer mutational variations. Nat Chem Biol 2012;8:238-45.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Singh A, Upadhyay V, Upadhyay AK, Singh SM, Panda AK. Protein recovery from inclusion bodies of Escherichia coli using mild solubilization process. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:41.  Back to cited text no. 36
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed99    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded28    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal