Users Online: 95
Home Print this page Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Ahead of Print Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Adv Biomed Res 2018,  7:153

Identification of Hemolysine Genes and their Association with Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern among Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in West of Iran


1 Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2 Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
3 Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine; Brucellosis Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

Date of Web Publication22-Jan-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mohammad Reza Arabestani
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Brucellosis Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_143_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Staphylococcus aureus is expressing a broad range of different hemolysins enhancing its ability to establish and maintain infection in humans. The aim of this study was to identify the types of hemolysins in different clinical isolates of S. aureus and their association with antibiotic resistance patterns. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional and descriptive study, clinical isolates of S. aureus were collected from Hamedan's hospitals during an 11-month period from June 2016 to January 2017 and identified by using biochemical tests. To determine the antibiotic resistance pattern, disk diffusion method and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were conducted. Genomic DNA was extracted using extraction kit. The polymerase chain reaction was done with specific primers for identification of hla, hlb, hld, and hld genes. Results: Among a total of 389 clinical samples, 138 isolates (35.45%) of S. aureus were identified, which 87 isolates (63.04%) were cefoxitin MIC of >4 μg/ml and resistant to methicillin. The highest frequency of antibiotic resistance was observed against erythromycin in 108 isolates (78.26%) and penicillin in 133 isolates (96.37%) and the lowest resistance was against gatifloxacin in 50 isolates (36.23%) and Cefazolin in 11 isolates (97.7%). Furthermore, the hla, hlb, hld, and hlg genes were detected among 11 (7.97%), 7 (5.07%), 16 (11.59%), and 4 (2.89%) isolates, respectively. There was a significant relationship between the presence of alpha and delta hemolysin-encoding genes and the antibiotic resistance pattern of isolates (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The results exhibited that the association between the presence of the hemolysin genes and the antibiotic resistance pattern can be considered as a serious issue.

Keywords: Alpha-hemolysin, antibiotic resistance, beta-hemolysin, delta-hemolysine, Staphylococcus aureus, virulence factors


How to cite this article:
Motamedi H, Asghari B, Tahmasebi H, Arabestani MR. Identification of Hemolysine Genes and their Association with Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern among Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in West of Iran. Adv Biomed Res 2018;7:153

How to cite this URL:
Motamedi H, Asghari B, Tahmasebi H, Arabestani MR. Identification of Hemolysine Genes and their Association with Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern among Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in West of Iran. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Jul 16];7:153. Available from: http://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2018/7/1/153/247971




  Introduction Top


Staphylococcus aureus is an important human pathogen that can cause a variety of diseases ranging from chronic biofilm-associated infection to life-threatening infection. Approximately 30% of a healthy human population carries S. aureus asymptomatically in the anterior mucosa of their noses.[1] This pathogenic agent can cause severe disease in bacteremia, childhood pneumonia, osteomyelitis, and venereal diseases by secretory exotoxins, toxic shock syndrome, and enterotoxins.[2]

Due to the development of drug resistance, especially, in methicillin-resistant S. aurous (MRSA), treatment of its infection has been a serious problem. In early 1940, penicillin was one of the most effective agents against S. aureus infections. However since 1952, penicillin-resistant S. aureus has increased by 70% to 80%.[3] Resistance to penicillin was fully developed in 1961, and next, S. aureus showed resistance to other drugs, including methicillin, nafcillin, and oxacillin, and a wide range of broad-spectrum antibiotic groups in addition to penicillin.[4] Methicillin is a beta-lactam antibiotic and inhibits bacterial peptidoglycans synthesis and destroys cell walls by binding and inhibiting the activities of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), finally leading to bacterial death.[5] The resistance of S. aureus to methicillin is caused by the mecA gene, which encodes the PBP 2a (or PBP2').[6] The mecA gene is located on a mobile genetic element called Staphylococcal Cassette chromosome mec types.[7] S. aureus is well-known for its ability to elaborate a wide range of virulence factors, including hemolysins, exotoxins, leukocidins, superantigens, capsules, and secreted enzymes, allows this organism to overcome host defenses.[8],[9] Some of these toxins, including alpha-hemolysin, have been encoded in the genome, while others such as Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) are encoded on mobile genetic elements such as prophage.[10],[11] Lysis of red blood cells by S. aureus is mainly mediated by the different hemolysins known as alpha (α), beta (β), delta (δ) toxins, and gamma (PVL) hemolysins. The alpha-hemolysin is a 33 kDa toxin encoded by the hla gene and is secreted by clinical isolates of S. aureus, which can cause clinical symptoms in humans, including pneumonia, sepsis, and brain abscess.[12],[13],[14]

Beta toxin or sphingomyelinase, with a molecular weight of 35 KDa, is coded by the hlb gene. One of the activities of this toxin in clinical conditions can be described as human lung, eye infection (cornea) and an ability to prevent the ciliary of nasal epithelium cells has been described.[14],[15] The presence of a gap in the signal segment in the terminal region of the alpha and beta toxins indicates that they are secreted through the secretion system pathways.[16] Delta hemolysins is a 26 amino acid peptide encoded by the hld gene.[17],[18] In contrast to alpha and beta toxin, delta toxin does not cause any split in the signal segment, and its secretion mechanism has not yet been fully understood.[17]

Because the genetic structure for delta toxin is encoded with polarized RNAIII molecules, the transcriptional activity of which is a group of virulence factors such as alpha toxin, enterotoxins and toxin shock-like syndrome, as well as transcriptional inhibition surface proteins, including superficial protein A (Spa), has not been elucidated to be accurately related to the delta toxin contamination with S. aureus.[19],[20],[21] The S. aureus gamma-toxins are β-barrel pore-forming toxins that are secreted from the bacteria as monomers. The gamma-toxin monomers are comprised S and F class subunits, corresponding to slow and fast elution from an ion exchange column.[22],[23] The aim of this study was to identify the types of hemolysins in different clinical isolates of S. aureus and determine the association of these agents with antimicrobial resistance patterns.


  Materials and Methods Top


Bacterial isolates

This study was conducted on 389 clinical samples including blood, urine, catheter, nasal swab, and ulcers of both outpatients and patients admitted to selected hospitals of the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences from June 2016 to January 2017 (during an 11-month period). The sample collection in this study was carried out with the Code of Ethics Committee No. IR. UMSHA. REC.1395.327 adopted by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. The samples were cultured on Blood Agar (Merck, Germany), an enriched base with 5% sterile fresh blood of sheep (Sinapooyesh Iran), and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Diagnostic tests were performed according to the diagnostic protocols. After observing the colonies, Gram-positive cocci were isolated using coloring forms. Slide catalase test was used to identify staphylococci from streptococci. The slide and tube coagulase test were used for the identification of S. aureus from other Staphylococcus species. The oxidative-fermentative test was used to detect staphylococci from Micrococcus. Coagulase test was used to distinguish coagulase-positive staphylococci from coagulase-negative isolates.[24],[25]

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

For all S. aureus isolates, antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (2015) guidelines, Applied antibiotics (Mast, England) including cefoxitin (Fox) 30 μg, tetracycline (TE) 10 μg, gentamycin (GM) 10 μg, erythromycin (E) 15 μg, penicillin (10u), vancomycin (VAN) 30 μg, amikacin 30 μg, cefazolin (CZ) 10 μg, ciprofloxacin (CIP) 5 μg, gatifloxacin 10 μg, and norfloxacin (NR) 10 μg, Methicillin-resistance was examined using cefoxitin disk and cefoxitin E-test (Italy Liofilchem). The S. aureus ATCC25923 and S. aureus ATCC43300 were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.

DNA extraction

Total DNA was extracted using the DNA extraction Kit (Cina-gene Co., Iran), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quality of extracting DNA was assessed spectrophotometrically by the Nanodrop ND-1000 (Nanodrop Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.[25]

Polymerase chain reaction detection of hemolysin genes

The reaction mixture for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was 25 μL that was prepared as follows: 12.5 μl of 2x Taq premix Master mix (Ampliqon UK), 7.5 μl of sterile double distilled water, 1 μl of each forward and reverse primer [Table 1], and 3 μl of DNA sample. The DNA samples as well as a positive control (S. aureus ATCC43300) and a negative control S. aureus ATCC 25423) were amplified for hla and hld genes by an initial denaturation step for 5 min at 94°C followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 59°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 1 min and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min in a Bio-Rad Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA), and the PCR program for hlb and hlg genes was an initial denaturation step for 5 min at 94°C followed by 45 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 65°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min in a Bio-Rad Thermal Cycler. The products PCR were subjected to 2.5% Agarose gel electrophoresis. To control the quality and evaluate the results, S. aureus ATCC25923 was used as negative control and S. aureus ATCC 49775 was used as positive control[22] [Table 1].
Table 1: The sequences of primers used to detect hemolysin genes in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus

Click here to view


Sequencing

One sample of each hemolysin PCR products (amplicons) was sequenced by Bioneer Co., Korea mediated by Pishgam Co., Iran, and the data were analyzed using the Chromas software.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16 (SPSS Inc. Released 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc, IBM, USA). Descriptive statistical methods were used to determine the frequency, percentage and mean, and Chi-square test was used to compare the qualitative results, and independent t-test to compare quantitative data. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant in comparative data.


  Results Top


Isolation and prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates

Among 389 clinical samples, 138 isolates (35.45%) of S. aureus were identified and 87 isolates (63.04%) were identified as MRSA and 51 isolates (38.95%) were identified as MSSA. The results of collected samples are shown in [Table 2].
Table 2: Distribution of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from Hamadan hospitals based on the sample source

Click here to view


Of the 138 clinical isolates of S. aureus, 27 isolates (19.56%) from the wound, 39 isolates (28.26%) from the blood, 22 isolates (15.94%) of urine, 18 isolates (13.04%) from the trachea, 12 isolates (8.69%) of catheter, 14 isolates (10.41%) of swabs, and 6 isolates (34.4%) were isolated from outpatients.

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus Scientific Name Search  is olated from clinical samples

The results of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the 138 S. aureus isolates examined, has been shown in [Figure 1].
Figure 1: The prevalence of antibiotic resistance pattern for clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus

Click here to view


Moreover, 108 (78.26%) isolates were resistant to E, 133 (96.7%) to penicillin, 81 (58.69%) to CIP, 99 (71.73%) to TE, 33 (23.91%) to gatifloxacin, 50 (36.23%) to gentamicin, 11 (97.7%) to CZ and 71 (45.44%) were resistant to NR and 87 (63.04%) isolates with a minimum inhibitory concentration of >4 μg/ml and were resistance to methicillin [Figure 2].
Figure 2: The primary screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by the E-test (Liofelichem, Italy). The Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 were used as a positive and negative control

Click here to view


Prevalence of hemolytic genes

The hemolytic genes alpha, beta, delta, and gamma were detected as follows: 11 isolates (7.97%) with hla gene, 7 (5.07%) with hlb gene, 16 (11.59%) with hld gene, and 4 (2.89%) had the hlg gene [Table 3] and [Figure 3].
Table 3: Statistical analysis for determining possible relationship between antibiotic resistance pattern and hemolysin factor genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

Click here to view
Figure 3: Gel electrophoresis for polymerase chain reaction assays products. Lane M: 100-bp DNA size marker (Fermentas, lituani), Lane: (1 and 19): Negative sample, Lane (2-5): hla (209 bp), Lane (6-9): hlb (309 bp), Lane (10-13): hld (111 bp), and Lane (14-18): hlg (535 bp)

Click here to view


Relationship between the presence of hla, hlb, hld, and hlg genes and antibiotics resistance pattern in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus

Considering the pattern of antibiotic resistance, there was a significant relationship between the presence of antibiotics and the genes of the alpha and delta hemolysines. In contrast to the alpha and delta hemolysine genes, there was no significant relationship between the presence of antibiotics studied and the agent genes for beta and gamma hemolsine. In all cases, P ≤ 0.05 were considered as a statistically significant relationship between the variables under consideration [Table 4].
Table 4: Statistical analysis for determining possible relationship between samples type and hemolysin factor genes in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

Click here to view


Results of gene sequencing

The results of the blast of the intended genes product indicated that it has the same DNA sequences and all PCR assay results were confirmed.


  Discussion Top


MRSA is one of the most dangerous strains that have resistance to the wide range of antibiotics. MRSA can also produce various virulence factors along with resistance. The presence of pathogens in the body can threaten human health.[25] Besides the extraordinary capability to accumulate antimicrobial resistance determinants, S. aureus possess an enormous arsenal of virulence factors showing a unique ability to evade the host immune defenses.[5],[6] The ability of S. aureus to cause disease depends on multiple strategies and on the redundancy of virulence factors. The group of hemolysins comprises toxins assembled out of one type of monomer like α-HL or the PSMs, bicomponent hemolysins such as PVL and γ-HL and the sphingomyelinase β-HL.[8],[26] Although these toxins differ in their structure, all of them can lyze blood cells by the formation of transmembrane pores. The relationship between pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance in S. aureus depends on a variety of factors, the most important of which are environmental factors, adhesion molecules, host immune evasion, gene regulators, transcription factors, and bacterial toxin secretion.[27],[28] Our research discusses this relationship and analyzes the production of various hemolysin in S. aureus and antibiotic resistance as an effective factor on each other.

In the present study, the highest antibiotic resistance was to penicillin and E being more than 90%, and the lowest resistance was to CZ which is similar to the finding of studies of Akia and Amini and Tafaroji et al.,[29],[30] In studies by Arabestani et al., the highest antibiotic resistance in S. aureus was against methicillin, gentamicin, and CIP, with a frequency of >90% and increase of >90% of the resistance to ofloxacin, TE and clindamycin which is similar to the obtained results of the present study.[28],[31] In addition, our results also demonstrated that all isolates were susceptible to vancomycin. However, in a study by Gitau et al., the prevalence of E, gentamicin, and cefocytosine antibodies was 33%, 13%, and 28%, respectively.[32] Naimi et al. also found that the resistance pattern to gentamicin was 23% and CZ 22%.[33] Despite, in our study, the frequency of resistance to antibiotics gentamicin, E, cefocytosine, and ceftazidine was 36.23%, 78.26%, 63.04%, and 45.44%, respectively. This can be attributed to the culture of drug use, the pattern of presentation by physicians, the nonproliferation of mutated strains as well as the weather. In the study of Grenni et al., ecological and environmental effects of antibiotic resistance patterns have been reported. They stated that these conditions alter the metabolism of bacteria and even interfere with the spread of new multiple drug resistant strains.[34]

In some studies, the association between antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity factors in S. aureus has been investigated. In the present study, the susceptible and resistant strains of methicillin were investigated for the presence of genes producing hemolysin.[26] The hla, hlb, hld, and hlg genes were detected among 11 (7.97%), 7 (5.07%), 16 (11.59%), and 4 (2.89%) isolates, respectively. Meanwhile, the frequency of hemolysin genes in MRSA strains was 63.35% and in MSSA strains was 72.13%. Furthermore, the prevalence of hla, hlb, hld, and hlg genes in MRSA strains was 9.19%, 8.04%, 13.79%, and 3.44%, respectively. Clinical information was also gathered about each patient. No difference was observed between MSSA and clinical specimen. On a hemolysin gene level, patients colonized with isolates encoding hla, hlb, hld, and hlg genes had significantly higher more frequent when compared to strains lacking the gene. However, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus strains also carry hemolysin genes in some cases, but the prevalence was higher in methicillin-resistant strains. Regarding the pattern of antibiotic resistance in methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant strains, there was a significant relationship between the presence of hemolytic agent genes and the antibiotic resistance pattern. Studies done by Schroeder et al. indicate furthermore a role of virulence factors in the development of resistance to the antibiotic in humans because the presence of virulence genes was found to be significantly associated with antibiotic resistance in S. aureus and invasive Staphylococcal infections. In addition, in this study, it was found that there is a significant relationship between CA. MRSA isolates and the presence of certain S. aureus toxins. While in our review, there was no significant relationship between these two variables. Clinical isolates of hemolysin producing S. aureus are found most in blood and ulcers to cause more damage to the patient. Host immunity, regulatory activity genes, and the involvement of some environmental factors can produce hemolysin in CA. MRSA strains.[27] Studies by Remy et al. showed that MRSA strains could produce more levels of toxin and pathogens. The results of our studies showed that the prevalence of hemolytic agent genes in strains with multiple resistance was higher than susceptible strains.[35] The strains of superantigens toxins, particularly strains that produce toxic shock syndrome, can play an important role in drug resistance, can produce more intense toxins and ultimately, more damage potential. On the other hand, with the excessive consumption of antibiotics in recent decades, the emergence of resistant strains has been emerged. Hemolysins and their effects on the increasing of staphylococcal infections can be one of the most important issues that make the identification of strains generating hemolysin more relevant. In the present study, hemolysin alpha and delta were the most frequent and beta-hemolysin and sometimes also had the lowest abundance.

Alpha-hemolysin is a cytolytic and cytotoxic toxin implicated in severe skin infections, pneumonia, and sepsis. In the present study, hlg and hla genes have the highest frequency in MRSA strains and have a significant association with the antibiotic pattern. A study of Luisa et al. showed that there is a significant relationship between antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity of staphylococci. The frequency of genes producing toxins in S. aureus isolates collected of blood and urine was higher than wound and catheter, also, there was a significant relationship between the types of the clinical sample with the presence of toxin-producing genes. Furthermore, in studies conducted by Alenizi and Beceiro et al., studies, there was a significant correlation between pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance.[36],[37] Further indication that hemolysins are important virulence factors are also provided by studies which investigated the expression levels of hemolysins in different strains: High levels of α-PSMs are mainly produced by common MRSA strains like USA300 and are associated with enhanced virulence of these strains compared to MSSA strains. Similar to what is observed for most of the other S. aureus secreted proteins, alpha-hemolysin is not expressed constitutively.[3] The hla expression is activated during the postexponential-early stationary phase of growth, and toxin production is coordinately controlled by several regulators, including the Agr and SarA. These two regulators play a very important role in the formation of biofilms and quorum sensing.[8] Hemolysins indirectly increase the bacteria against antibiotics by acting on their activity and cause the emergence of resistant strains. Our research showed that the isolates producing hemolysin had the highest resistance to different antibiotic groups. The reason is the combination of various hemolysin, especially hla and hlg in these strains. Koch et al. showed that the presence of genes responsible for resistance and genes of pathogenicity as well as antimicrobial resistance patterns can be significantly correlated. In this study, among S. aureus isolates, it became clear that strains with antibiotic resistance had more invasion and pathogenicity. The similarity between these results and our observations showed that there is a significant relationship between antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity in S. aureus isolates.[38] This makes it increasingly important to identify strains that produce different hemolysin and can help identify resistant strains.

A central principle in effective regulation of both antibiotic resistance and virulence is the ability to sense and respond to the bacteria's external environment, specifically, the presence and concentration of ambient antibiotic.[8] In blood and ulcer samples, the bacteria may be affected by various factors, such as fever and body temperature, to alter its metabolic structure to cope with this increase in temperature. A change in the activity of regulating genes such as agr may change the production of hemolysin in S. aureus.[23] Our results showed that there is a significant relationship between clinical isolates and hemolysin secretion. Our results showed that there is a significant relationship between clinical isolates and hemolysin secretion. Although Corredor Arias et al., reported no significant correlation between the type of clinical sample and the virulence factors,[7] Osman et al., Chen et al., and Arabestani et al. reported a significant relationship between pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance.[10],[20],[28]

Our knowledge of this study suggests that the presence of hemolysin in S. aureus can lead to different resistance patterns. The interference of many factors, such as biofilm formation, RNAIII activity, temperature, environmental variables, and many other factors, can affect the relationship between resistance and pathogenesis. In this study, despite the lack of examination of these cases, this connection was raised for various reasons. Taken together, epidemiological and experimental data suggest an important role for hemolysins such as α-HL, β-HL, γ-HL, and PSMs in S. aureus infections, based on antibiotics resistance. However, the exact impact of some hemolysins remains to be elusive since the relevance of the existing data for the in vivo situation in humans is conflicting.


  Conclusion Top


The results obtained in the present study concluded that the growing resistance to antibiotics in MRSA strains is increasing. However, increasing the prevalence of MRSA strains can play an important role in the development of various human infections. Hence, due to the association between the pattern of antibiotic resistance and the production of hemolysin in MRSA strains, identification of isolates with hemolytic genes is of great importance. Furthermore, this work describes that staphylococcal hemolysins are important virulence factors for S. aureus and explains the significant relationship between different hemolysin and antimicrobial resistance pattern.

Financial support and sponsorship

The authors are grateful to Vice Chancellor for Research of the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, for providing financial support of this study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Monecke S, Müller E, Büchler J, Stieber B, Ehricht R. Staphylococcus aureus in vitro secretion of alpha toxin (hla) correlates with the affiliation to clonal complexes. PLoS One 2014;9:e100427.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Chen X, Wu Z, Zhou Y, Zhu J, Li K, Shao H, et al. Molecular and virulence characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in burn patients. Front Lab Med 2017;1:43-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kong C, Neoh HM, Nathan S. Targeting Staphylococcus aureus toxins: A potential form of anti-virulence therapy. Toxins (Basel) 2016;8. pii: E72.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Agnoletti F, Mazzolini E, Bacchin C, Bano L, Berto G, Rigoli R, et al. First reporting of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 in an industrial rabbit holding and in farm-related people. Vet Microbiol 2014;170:172-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Tahmasebi H, Zeyni B, Dehbashi S, Motamedi H, Vafaeefar M, Keramat F, et al. The study of blaZ and mecA gene expression in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains and the relationship between the gene expression patterns. J Isfahan Med Sch 2017;35:1062-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mandal S, Manisha DebMandal, Saha K, Pal NK.In vitro antibacterial activity of three indian spices against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Oman Med J 2011;26:319-23.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Corredor Arias LF, Luligo Espinal JS, Moncayo Ortiz JI, Santacruz Ibarra JJ, Álvarez Aldana A. Relationship between super antigenicity, antimicrobial resistance and origin of Staphylococcus aureus isolated. Colomb Med (Cali) 2016;47:15-20.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Dehbashi S, Tahmasebi H, Zeyni B, Arabestani M. The relationship between promoter-dependent quorum sensing induced genes and methicillin resistance in clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J Zanjan Univ Med Sci 2018;26:75-87.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
DeLeo FR, Otto M, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF. Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 2010;375:1557-68.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Chen Y, Yeh AJ, Cheung GY, Villaruz AE, Tan VY, Joo HS, et al. Basis of virulence in a panton-valentine leukocidin-negative community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain. J Infect Dis 2015;211:472-80.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK, Höök M. Adhesion, invasion and evasion: The many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014;12:49-62.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bubeck Wardenburg J, Patel RJ, Schneewind O. Surface proteins and exotoxins are required for the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Infect Immun 2007;75:1040-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Xiao M, Zhao R, Zhang Q, Fan X, O'Sullivan MV, Li DF, et al. Genotypic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus α-hemolysin gene (hla) and its association with clonal background: Implications for vaccine development. PLoS One 2016;11:e0149112.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
O'Callaghan RJ, Callegan MC, Moreau JM, Green LC, Foster TJ, Hartford OM, et al. Specific roles of alpha-toxin and beta-toxin during Staphylococcus aureus corneal infection. Infect Immun 1997;65:1571-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hayashida A, Bartlett AH, Foster TJ, Park PW. Staphylococcus aureus beta-toxin induces lung injury through syndecan-1. Am J Pathol 2009;174:509-18.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Sibbald MJ, Ziebandt AK, Engelmann S, Hecker M, de Jong A, Harmsen HJ, et al. Mapping the pathways to staphylococcal pathogenesis by comparative secretomics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2006;70:755-88.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Wiseman GM. The hemolysins of Staphylococcus aureus. Bacteriol Rev 1975;39:317-44.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Burnside K, Lembo A, de Los Reyes M, Iliuk A, Binhtran NT, Connelly JE, et al. Regulation of hemolysin expression and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus by a serine/threonine kinase and phosphatase. PLoS One 2010;5:e11071.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Dinges MM, Orwin PM, Schlievert PM. Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000;13:16-34.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Osman K, Alvarez-Ordóñez A, Ruiz L, Badr J, ElHofy F, Al-Maary KS, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci from imported beef meat. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2017;16:35.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Khan S, Rasheed F, Zahra R. Genetic polymorphism of agr locus and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus at two hospitals in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci 2014;30:172-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Vandenesch F, Lina G, Henry T. Staphylococcus aureus hemolysins, bi-component leukocidins, and cytolytic peptides: A redundant arsenal of membrane-damaging virulence factors? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2012;2:12.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Alonzo F 3rd, Torres VJ. The bicomponent pore-forming leucocidins of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2014;78:199-230.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Bokaeian M, Tahmasebi H. Molecular identification of genes responsible for resistance to aminoglycosides and methicillin in clinical samples of Staphylococcus aureus. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2017;19:38-46.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Vafaee Mehr M, Alikhani M, Tahmasebi H, Arabestani M. Identification and determination of the relationship between ccr alleles and antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2017;19:28-35.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Meugnier H, Forey F, et al. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun 2002;70:631-41.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Schroeder M, Brooks BD, Brooks AE. The complex relationship between virulence and antibiotic resistance. Genes (Basel) 2017;8. pii: E39.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Arabestani MR, Rastiyani S, Alikhani MY, Mousavi SF. The relationship between prevalence of antibiotics resistance and virulence factors genes of MRSA and MSSA strains isolated from clinical samples, West Iran. Oman Med J 2018;33:134-40.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Akia A, Amini K. The prevalence of van gene alleles in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med 2017;21:64-71.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Tafaroji J, Aghaali M, Heydari H. An investigation of the frequency of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers and its antibiotic susceptibility pattern in the staff of different wards of Qom Hazrat Masumeh hospital 2015, Iran. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2017;10(11):79-84.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Arabestani MR, Rastiany S, Mousavi SF, Ghafel S, Alikhani MY. Identification of toxic shock syndrom and exfoliative toxin genes of Staphylococcus aureus in carrier persons, resistant and susceptible methicillin. Tehran Univ Med J 2015;73:554-60.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Gitau W, Masika M, Musyoki M, Museve B, Mutwiri T. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from clinical specimens at Kenyatta national hospital. BMC Res Notes 2018;11:226.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Naimi HM, Rasekh H, Noori AZ, Bahaduri MA. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from patients at two main health facilities in Kabul, Afghanistan. BMC Infect Dis 2017;17:737.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Grenni P, Ancona V, Barra Caracciolo A. Ecological effects of antibiotics on natural ecosystems: A review. Microchem J 2018;136:25-39.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Dunyach-Remy C, Ngba Essebe C, Sotto A, Lavigne JP. Staphylococcus aureus toxins and diabetic foot ulcers: Role in pathogenesis and interest in diagnosis. Toxins (Basel) 2016;8. pii: E209.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Alenizi DA. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic resistance in children with atopic dermatitis in Arar, Saudi Arabia. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg 2014;18:22-6.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Beceiro A, Tomás M, Bou G. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence: A successful or deleterious association in the bacterial world? Clin Microbiol Rev 2013;26:185-230.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Koch G, Yepes A, Förstner KU, Wermser C, Stengel ST, Modamio J, et al. Evolution of resistance to a last-resort antibiotic in Staphylococcus aureus via bacterial competition. Cell 2014;158:1060-71.  Back to cited text no. 38
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed656    
    Printed38    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded104    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal