Users Online: 3539
Home Print this page Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Ahead of Print Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 48

The Role of Fibular Fixation in the Treatment of Combined Distal Tibia and Fibula Fracture: A Randomized, Control Trial


Department of Orthopedics, Kashani Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Morteza Nouri
Department of Orthopedics, Kashani Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.205190

Rights and Permissions

Background: This randomized, parallel-group, non-blinded study was designed to determine the role of fibular fixation in the treatment outcomes of combined distal tibia and fibula fractures. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients with distal tibial and fibular fractures were randomly divided in two groups of case and controls. In the case group, fibula was fixed prior to the fixation of tibia. In the control group, tibia was fixed without fibular fixation. Primary outcomes were varus–valgus angulation, anterior–posterior angulation, union and side effects. Follow-up visit and radiographs were taken 2 and 4 weeks as well as 3, 6 and 9 months after surgery. Results: During the follow-up, 11 out of 60 patients in case and control groups were excluded. We recruited 24 and 25 patients in the case and control group, respectively. Intramedullary nailing was used in 8 patients of case and 11 patients of control group. Plate and screw were used in 16 patients in the case and 14 patients in the control group. Varus/valgus and anterior–posterior angulation were not statistically significant between two groups (P ≥ 0.05). The frequency of tibial and fibula union after 1, 3, 6 and 9 months in case and controls groups were not statistically significant (P ≥ 0.05). The frequency of nonunion of tibia and fibula, infection and nerve injury in studied groups were not statistically significant (P ≥ 0.05). Conclusion: We did not observe any significant improvement using fibular fixation in the treatment outcomes of tibia distal fractures.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1416    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded326    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal