Users Online: 491
Home Print this page Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Browse articles Submit article Ahead of Print Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
Previous article Browse articles Next article 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Adv Biomed Res 2017,  6:21

The Mediating Role of Mental Health in the Relations between Dietary Behaviors and General Health: A Cross-sectional Study


1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Public Health Faculty, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4 Psychosomatic Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Web Publication01-Mar-2017

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Mohammad Reza Maracy
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Public Health Faculty, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.201333

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: The aim of this study is to find a pathway to explaining the relations between dietary behaviors with mental health and psychological functioning. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study contains 4763 participants from the employees of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. In this study, four questionnaires were administered which were provided as follows: demographic characteristics, 21-item dietary behaviors questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire, and 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). We started the analysis with the structural equation modeling (SEM) model with 4 unobserved latent and 16 observed variables. Results: The results show that the regression coefficient (standard error) of diet behavior on mental health and mental health on GHQ were − 1 (0.37) and 0.02 (0.01) with their P values as 0.007 and 0.01, respectively. For this model, the estimated root mean square error of approximation is 0.062 with 90% confidence interval of (0.060–0.065). In addition, the comparative fit indices (CFIs) were as 0.866 for incremental fit index and 0.866 for CFI. All these indices represent fairly good fit of the model to the data. Conclusion: We can conclude that “lower scores on diet behavior – higher scores on mental health problems” and “higher mean scores in depression and/or anxiety – higher scores in GHQ domains.” The SEM results showed that dietary behaviors have significance related to depression and/or anxiety and general health status.

Keywords: Dietary behaviors, general health, mental health


How to cite this article:
Nematollahi S, Keshteli AH, Esmaillzadeh A, Roohafza H, Afshar H, Adibi P, Maracy MR. The Mediating Role of Mental Health in the Relations between Dietary Behaviors and General Health: A Cross-sectional Study. Adv Biomed Res 2017;6:21

How to cite this URL:
Nematollahi S, Keshteli AH, Esmaillzadeh A, Roohafza H, Afshar H, Adibi P, Maracy MR. The Mediating Role of Mental Health in the Relations between Dietary Behaviors and General Health: A Cross-sectional Study. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Jul 23];6:21. Available from: http://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2017/6/1/21/201333


  Introduction Top


It is now well-recognized that good quality of diet is important for good health. Nowadays, dietary patterns and their contributions to human health have got much attention. Food or nutrients are not consumed in isolation, rather, in compounds, which can interact with each other. Addressing dietary patterns provide an opportunity to get a proper feature about people's food habits and behaviors.[1]

Diet can help reduce the risk of several diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and cancer.[2],[3] Diet is influenced by several demographic characteristics. Numerous studies have reported that men are less likely to follow healthy eating recommendations. Men compared to women consume fewer fruits and vegetables, fewer high-fiber foods, fewer low-fat foods, and drink more soft drinks.[4],[5] Marriage also has an impact on eating behaviors in the way that married individuals have healthier diets than unmarried counterparts.[4] Mental disorders are an important cause of long-term disabilities.[6] The global burden of disease study conducted by the World Health Organization (2004) reported that by 2020, depression will be the second cause of disease burden worldwide behind cardiovascular diseases.[7] According to studies conducted in Iran, the prevalence of depression ranges between 5.8% and 21.3%.[8],[9] In addition, anxiety disorders can be regarded as significant mental health disorders that in addition to their prevalence (4.9–8.35% in Iran),[9] have a substantial detrimental impact on general health.[10],[11]

Depression has a long-lasting decrement in psychological functioning, as well. In a study conducted in Western Europe, the degree of disability was found to be related to the severity of depression.[12] Studies revealed that functioning abilities deteriorate with the severity of depression and co-morbid anxiety. In other words, functioning scores was higher among depressive anxious patients.[13],[14],[15] Scores of distress are a function of anxiety and depression, meaning that the highest degree of distress is found to be in depressive patients.[16] In addition, there is a higher likelihood for depressive individuals to lose their jobs.[17]

It is hypothesized that depression and/or anxiety may have a contribution on the patterns of food consumption; depressive symptoms may decline an individual's motivation to get involve in healthy eating and may lead to a poor diet.[18],[19]

Notwithstanding, diet and nutrition interfere biological processes underlying mental health, such as inflammation, brain plasticity, stress response system, and oxidative processes,[20],[21] much of the literature have focused on single food or nutrients.[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27]

The risk of depression and/or anxiety has been related inversely to dietary patterns fully loaded by fruits, vegetables, seafood, whole grains, low-fat dairy products, and directly been related to processed and fried foods, sweetened drinks, and salt.[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34]

Furthermore, few studies have investigated a number of variables of the effect of mood on feeding habits such as time and nutritional ingredients of meals, nutritional status, habitual patterns of feeding, and beliefs and attitudes about food. For example, breakfast intake is associated with improved mood and psychological status,[35],[36],[37],[38] whereas intake of a large size lunch is associated with negative moods.[35],[39] It is also shown that having dinner before going to bed is associated with the risk of depression in both men and women.[40]

To our knowledge, studies regarding the possible effects of different meals, time and feeding habits on mental disorders have not been addressed yet in Iran. On the other hand, mental disorders are one of the most costing disorders in work force and impulse a 27 times greater risk of disability in accomplishments;[41] hence, studying paths between dietary behaviors and mental morbidities could have a substantial impact on prevention strategies and could lead to parsimonious preventive approaches. Accordingly, this study is conducted to find a pathway to explaining the correlation of dietary behaviors with mental and psychological functioning morbidity.


  Materials and Methods Top


This cross-sectional study contains information within the framework of the Study on the Epidemiology of Psychological, Alimentary Health and Nutrition (SEPAHAN) project, related to epidemiological characteristics, dietary behaviors, mental health, and general health scores of employees in the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS). Details on design of the project and recruitment of participants have been provided elsewhere.[42]

A total of 4763 employees of IUMS were administered a demographic characteristics at baseline which included recording information about age, gender, marital status, and educational status. After collecting the questionnaires, data were available for 4147 respondents, which made the response rate as 87%.

Three questionnaires were administered as follows: A 21-item dietary behaviors questionnaire is used to assess the dietary behaviors of the respondents. Dietary behavior categories include the meals pattern with the total scores varying between 1 and 15; the intra-meal fluid intake with the total scores varying between 0 and 9; the eating rate with the total scores varying between 1 and 9; the fat intake contain with the total scores varying between 1 and 12; the spicy food intake with the total scores varying between 1 and 6; the meal-to-sleep interval with the total scores varying between 1 and 6; and the snack consumption with the total scores varying between 0 and 6. Higher score in the dietary behaviors of the respondents indicates a better habitant.

To assess mental health disorders, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire was administered to the respondents. It contains 14 items and consists of two subscales: Anxiety and depression. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (ranges between 0 and 3), giving the maximum score of 21 for anxiety and depression. Scores of 11 or more on either subscale are considered to be a significant “case” of psychological morbidity, whereas scores of 8–10 represent “borderline,” and 0–7 represent “normal.” This instrument yielded Cronbach's alpha coefficient to be 0.78 for the anxiety subscale and 0.86 for the depression subscale in Iranian population.[43]

To assess general health status, General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) was used. The scale asks whether the respondents were recently experiencing any particular behaviors or symptoms. Each item contains 4-point scale including less than usual, no more than usual, rather more than usual, or much more than usual.[44]

In this study, the 12-item version of GHQ (GHQ-12) was used as a screening tool for psychological functioning morbidity including three subscales as psychological distress (6 items), social dysfunction (4 items), and loss of confidence (2 items). Previous studies confirmed its validation and reliability properties in Iranian population. It gives a total score of 12 or 36 based on the selected scoring methods. The most common scoring methods are bi-modal (0, 0, 1, and 1) and Likert scoring style (0, 1, 2, and 3).[45] For the purpose of this study, the scoring method of (0, 0, 1, and 1) was used over the Likert scale method as the former eliminates any biases which might result from the respondents. A higher score indicates a greater degree of psychological distress.[44]

To find the factors of dietary behaviors, we used an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with the principal component method and the varimax rotation process. The dietary behaviors were explained by 7 underlying factors, namely “meal pattern,” “eating rate,” “spicy food intake,” “fat intake,” “intra-meal fluid intake,” “meal-to-sleep interval,” and “snack consumption.”

Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to test a theoretical model in which demographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, and educational level) and dietary behaviors were exogenous latent variables, and mental health disorders and general health status were endogenous latent variables. Global goodness of SEM fit indices included root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and comparative fit indices (CFIs). The RMSEA shows how well the model, with optimally chosen parameter estimates, would fit the population's covariance matrix. Values ≤0.05 for this index indicate good fit of the model. The CFIs are based on comparison of the default model with a base model, which is an independent model. CFIs comprise incremental fit index (IFI) and CFI; all range from 0 to 1. Values ≥0.9 indicate good fit of the model.[46]

We started the analysis of the SEM model with 4 latent variables, namely demographic (demographic characteristics), diet behavior (dietary behaviors), mental health (mental health problems), and General Health (GHQ) and 16 observed variables. The patterns for loading observed variables into latent compounds are as follows:

  • Age, gender, educational level, and marital status were performed on demographic
  • Meal pattern, eating rate, spicy food intake, fat intake, intra-meal fluid intake, meal-to-sleep interval, and snack consumption were performed on diet behavior
  • Depression and anxiety scores were performed on mental health
  • Psychological distress, social dysfunction, and loss of confidence were performed on GHQ.


The regression weights were computed with the maximum likelihood estimation method. We considered educational level, spicy food intake, depression, and psychological distress as reference variables for demographic, diet behavior, mental health, and GHQ, respectively.

For the purpose of the analysis, we used the SPSS and AMOS software (IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The analysis of data was performed using the SEM, based on [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Structural equation modeling model with 4 latent variables of demographic (demographic characteristics), diet behavior, mental health, and General Health Questionnaire

Click here to view



  Results Top


The mean age standard deviation (SD) of respondents was 36.6 (8.1) years, and most were female (55.7% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 54.2–57.2]) and married (81% [95% CI: 79.8–82.2]). More than half of the respondents (55.7% [95% CI: 54.2–57.2]) had academic degree and also only 11.5% (95% CI: 10.5–12.5) of them reported some level of depression. Employing the bimodal method of scoring the mean (SD) of score for psychological distress (varying between 0 and 6) was 1.2 (0.4); for social dysfunction (ranging from 0 to 4) was 1.4 (0.4); and for loss of confidence (varying between 0 and 2) was 1.1 (0.3) [Table 1].
Table 1: Main characteristics of the respondents (n=4763)*

Click here to view


Since the mean GHQ score provides the rough guide to choose the best cut-off point (66), we decided to categorize mean scores above the mean as a potential psychological morbidity (60). This categorization indicated that nearly 27% (95% CI: 25.6–28.3); 46% (95% CI: 44.5–47.5); and 19% (95% CI: 17.8–20.2) of the respondents suffer from psychological distress, social dysfunction, and loss of confidence, respectively [Table 1].

We used the factor analysis procedure to find the underlying factors related to the items of diet behaviors. Regression coefficients for diet behavior using an EFA with the principal component method are represented in [Table 2].
Table 2: Dietary behavior questions used in factor analysis (n=4763)

Click here to view


SEM places emphasis to the extent on which the default (hypothetical) model fits the data best. Using the SEM technique, the hypothetical model contains 16 observed variables: Age, sex, marital status, educational level, meal pattern, eating rate, spicy food intake, fat intake, intra-meal fluid intake, meal-to-sleep interval, snack consumption, anxiety score, depression score, psychological distress, social dysfunction, and loss of confidence; and 4 latent variables, namely demographic characteristics, dietary behaviors, mental health, and GHQ score [Figure 1].

The estimated RMSEA for this model is 0.062. The CFIs were 0.866 for IFI and 0.866 for CFI. These indices represent fairly good fit to the data.

The regression coefficient for the relationship between demographic characteristics and mental health was positive suggesting that being 1 year younger, being a female, being a single, divorced, or widowed and being in a 1 year higher educational level would result in 1.024 unit increase in mental health scores. The regression coefficient for the association between dietary behaviors and mental health problems showed a negative pattern which means that as individual scores one unit more on dietary behaviors, his/her anxiety and/or depression scores decrease by 1.00. The relationship between mental health and GHQ scores is positive (regression coefficient equal to 0.02). This can be interpreted as “higher mean scores in depression and/or anxiety – higher mean scores in GHQ domains.” The path regression coefficients for this model are represented in [Table 3].
Table 3: Regression coefficients for structure equation model (n=4763)

Click here to view


The last paragraph is deleted because it was additional information once the mental health variable was removed from the model and the results have not been shown.


  Discussion Top


Results of this study indicate a positive association between demographic characteristics and mental health disorders. It means that divorced or widowed females have the higher odd of being depressed and/or anxious. In addition, higher educational levels might be related to higher likelihood of depression and/or anxiety. These results have been supported by some other studies showing that females had approximately 2 times greater odds of being depressed and/or anxious compared to men.[8],[9] The elevated rate of mental health problems in Iranian women could be due to the extensive tasks for them in and out of home. In addition, this increased rate compared to European countries could be explained by biological, social, and familial pressures.[8],[47] It is suggested that eating mechanisms are defensive bodily barriers to cope with mental problems, especially in women.[48] Moreover, higher educational achievements could be related to occurrence of depression and/or anxiety.[9],[49],[50] Furthermore, divorced or widowed individuals have a higher likelihood of being psychologically disturbed.[8],[9],[12],[50],[51] Consistently, a study conducted on 18 countries worldwide showed that in developed societies being divorced and in developing ones being widowed was at elevated risk for mental morbidities compared to the others.[52] This relationship is found to be inverses for age; in that older ages are at lower risk for mental problems. Studies showing the association between age and mental problems seem to follow a direct path in low- or middle-income countries, while an inverse path in high-income countries.[2],[9],[12] The direct association observed in developing societies could be due to transition of active life style to retirement status and consequent mental health disorders.[52] The association between dietary behaviors and mental health problems shows a negative pattern. Specifically, individuals who have regular meal patterns (consume 3 meals/day) have lower scores on mental problems. Benton et al.found that eating breakfast in the morning results in better mood and memory functions.[35] Kanarek in a review showed that timing of the meals and habitual patterns of feeding behaviors can positively influence mood and cognitive performance.[39] While our results show the protective role of eating lunch on depression and anxiety (in terms of eating 3 regular meals/day), some studies showed that impaired mood was associated with consumption of lunch.[53],[54] In addition, slow eating rate, long meal-to-sleep interval, intake of less intra-meal fluid, eating healthy snacks daily, and consuming foods without animal fat would result in lower scores on depression and/or anxiety. These results were concordant with studies showing that eating healthy snacks,[35],[55] eating less animal fat,[22],[26],[28] and going to bed long after eating [40] could improve mood and mental tasks.


  Conclusion Top


Our study showed that SEM model can be used as a useful technique to distinguish different paths that exist between demographic characteristics and dietary behaviors to mental problems and general health status. Interestingly, the SEM results show that dietary behaviors and demographic characteristics have a significant relation to depression and/anxiety and general health problems.

To our knowledge, this is the first study examining the effects of dietary behaviors on mental problems and disability functions in Iran. The regression coefficients of the model show that dietary behaviors derived in this study have been loaded satisfactorily on the latent variable diet behavior. In addition, the regression coefficients show that age, gender, educational level, and marital status are good components of the latent variable demographic and the significance level for all observed variables exceeds the acceptable level. Due to the cross-sectional nature of the data set, we have no other information about the history of the mental problem episodes of the respondents. We have found that dietary behaviors are associated with depression, but since increasing food intake is in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition as a symptom for diagnosing depression, and on the other hand, mood may psychologically influence appetite and food choice and worsen eating behaviors of the individuals,[56],[57] we cannot draw any conclusions about the real direction of this association.

The focus of this study was the effect of dietary behaviors on psychological functions, and since this association was found to be significant, it is suggested that future research focus on dietary behaviors and their contributions on mood. Moreover, we found that dietary behaviors have an indirect effect on the general health status which can be a focus of the impact of the general health status on the dietary behaviors for interested researchers.

Acknowledgments

SEPAHAN was financially supported by Vice Chancellery for Research and Technology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS). We wish to thank all staff of IUMS who participated in our study.

This study was financially supported by Vice Chancellery for Research and Technology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS).

Financial support and sponsorship

The financial support of this research was received from Deputy of Faculty of Medicine of the Isfahan University of Medical Science.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Hoffmann K, Schulze MB, Schienkiewitz A, Nöthlings U, Boeing H. Application of a new statistical method to derive dietary patterns in nutritional epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:935-44.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Williamson C. Dietary factors and depression in older people. Br J Community Nurs 2009;14:422, 424-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Allison DB, Newcomer JW, Dunn AL, Blumenthal JA, Fabricatore AN, Daumit GL, et al. Obesity Among those with Mental Disorders: A National Institute of Mental Health Meeting Report. Report No. 36. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Deshmukh-Taskar P, Nicklas TA, Yang SJ, Berenson GS. Does food group consumption vary by differences in socioeconomic, demographic, and lifestyle factors in young adults? The Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:223-34.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Beer-Borst S, Hercberg S, Morabia A, Bernstein MS, Galan P, Galasso R, et al. Dietary patterns in six European populations: Results from EURALIM, a collaborative European data harmonization and information campaign. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000;54:253-62.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med 2006;3:e442.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lopez AD, Murray CC. The global burden of disease, 1990-2020. Nat Med 1998;4:1241-3.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Noorbala AA, Bagheri Yazdi SA, Yasamy MT, Mohammad K. Mental health survey of the adult population in Iran. Br J Psychiatry 2004;184:70-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Mohammadi MR, Davidian H, Noorbala AA, Malekafzali H, Naghavi HR, Pouretemad HR, et al. An epidemiological survey of psychiatric disorders in Iran. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2005;1:16.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Gladis MM, Gosch EA, Dishuk NM, Crits-Christoph P. Quality of life: Expanding the scope of clinical significance. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999;67:320-31.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Mendlowicz MV, Stein MB. Quality of life in individuals with anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:669-82.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Tanaka H, Sasazawa Y, Suzuki S, Nakazawa M, Koyama H. Health status and lifestyle factors as predictors of depression in middle-aged and elderly Japanese adults: A seven-year follow-up of the Komo-Ise cohort study. BMC Psychiatry 2011;11:1.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Aalto AM, Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Uutela A, Pirkola S. The beck depression inventory and general health questionnaire as measures of depression in the general population: A validation study using the composite international diagnostic interview as the gold standard. Psychiatry Res 2012;197:163-71.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Spijker J, Graaf R, Bijl RV, Beekman AT, Ormel J, Nolen WA. Functional disability and depression in the general population. Results from the Netherlands mental health survey and incidence study (NEMESIS). Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004;110:208-14.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Malyszczak K, Pawlowski T, Pyszel A, Kiejna A. Correlation between depressive and anxiety symptoms, distress and functioning. Psychiatr Pol 2006;40:269-77.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kawada T, Kuratomi Y, Kanai T. Depressive feelings, feelings of unhappiness, and subsequent psychological wellbeing among workers. Work 2011;39:315-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Williams CD, Schouten R. Assessment of occupational impairment and disability from depression. J Occup Environ Med 2008;50:441-50.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Anton SD, Miller PM. Do negative emotions predict alcohol consumption, saturated fat intake, and physical activity in older adults? Behav Modif 2005;29:677-88.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Walsh JL, Senn TE, Carey MP. Longitudinal associations between health behaviors and mental health in low-income adults. Transl Behav Med 2013;3:104-13.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Bourre JM. Effects of nutrients (in food) on the structure and function of the nervous system: Update on dietary requirements for brain. Part 1: Micronutrients. J Nutr Health Aging 2006;10:377-85.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Gómez-Pinilla F. Brain foods: The effects of nutrients on brain function. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008;9:568-78.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Christensen L. The effect of food intake on mood. Clin Nutr 2001;20:161-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Timonen M, Horrobin D, Jokelainen J, Laitinen J, Herva A, Räsänen P. Fish consumption and depression: The Northern Finland 1966 birth cohort study. J Affect Disord 2004;82:447-52.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Appleton KM, Peters TJ, Hayward RC, Heatherley SV, McNaughton SA, Rogers PJ, et al. Depressed mood and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake from fish: Non-linear or confounded association? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2007;42:100-4.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Jacka FN, Overland S, Stewart R, Tell GS, Bjelland I, Mykletun A. Association between magnesium intake and depression and anxiety in community-dwelling adults: The Hordaland Health Study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2009;43:45-52.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Sánchez-Villegas A, Verberne L, De Irala J, Ruíz-Canela M, Toledo E, Serra-Majem L, et al. Dietary fat intake and the risk of depression: The SUN Project. PLoS One 2011 26;6:e16268.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Yary T, Aazami S. Dietary intake of zinc was inversely associated with depression. Biol Trace Elem Res 2012;145:286-90.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Crichton GE, Murphy KJ, Bryan J. Dairy intake and cognitive health in middle-aged South Australians. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2010;19:161-71.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Jacka FN, Pasco JA, Mykletun A, Williams LJ, Hodge AM, O'Reilly SL, et al. Association of Western and traditional diets with depression and anxiety in women. Am J Psychiatry 2010;167:305-11.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Nanri A, Kimura Y, Matsushita Y, Ohta M, Sato M, Mishima N, et al. Dietary patterns and depressive symptoms among Japanese men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr 2010;64:832-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Bakhtiyari M, Ehrampoush E, Enayati N, Rastmanesh R, Delpisheh A, Zayeri F, et al. Correlation Between Fast Food Consumption and Levels of Anxiety in Students of Medical Science Universities in Tehran; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Bakhtiyari M, Ehrampoush E, Enayati N, Joodi G, Sadr S, Delpisheh A, et al. Anxiety as a consequence of modern dietary pattern in adults in Tehran – Iran. Eat Behav 2013;14:107-12.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Crawford GB, Khedkar A, Flaws JA, Sorkin JD, Gallicchio L. Depressive symptoms and self-reported fast-food intake in midlife women. Prev Med 2011;52:254-7.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Konttinen H, Männistö S, Sarlio-Lähteenkorva S, Silventoinen K, Haukkala A. Emotional eating, depressive symptoms and self-reported food consumption. A population-based study. Appetite 2010;54:473-9.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Benton D, Slater O, Donohoe RT. The influence of breakfast and a snack on psychological functioning. Physiol Behav 2001;74:559-71.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Adrian M, Charlesworth-Attie S, Vander Stoep A, McCauley E, Becker L. Health promotion behaviors in adolescents: Prevalence and association with mental health status in a statewide sample. J Behav Health Serv Res 2014;41:140-52.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Faulkner GE, Irving HM. Multiple health-risk behaviour and psychological distress in adolescence. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2012;21:171-8.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Huang CJ, Hu HT, Fan YC, Liao YM, Tsai PS. Associations of breakfast skipping with obesity and health-related quality of life: Evidence from a national survey in Taiwan. Int J Obes (Lond) 2010;34:720-5.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Kanarek R. Psychological effects of snacks and altered meal frequency. Br J Nutr 1997;77 Suppl 1:S105-18.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Ohira T, Nakamura C, Imano H, Okada T, Kitamura A, Kiyama M, et al. Epidemiological study of preferable life style for psychological health promotion. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi 2007;54:226-35.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Fallah R, Farhadi S, Amini K, Mohajeri M. Prevalence of depression in personnel of Zanjan University of Medical Sciences. ZUMS J 2011;19:107-13.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Adibi P, Keshteli AH, Esmaillzadeh A, Afshar H, Roohafza H, Bagherian-Sararoudi R, et al. The study on the epidemiology of psychological, alimentary health and nutrition (SEPAHAN): Overview of methodology. J Res Med Sci 2012;17:s291-297.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Ebrahimi M, Jarvandi S. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:14.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Goldberg DP, Blackwell B. Psychiatric illness in general practice. A detailed study using a new method of case identification. Br Med J 1970;1:439-43.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Montazeri A, Harirchi AM, Shariati M, Garmaroudi G, Ebadi M, Fateh A. The 12-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:66.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Articles. 2008 Jan 1:2.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Accortt EE, Freeman MP, Allen JJ. Women and major depressive disorder: Clinical perspectives on causal pathways. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008;17:1583-90.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Jenkins S, Horner SD. Barriers that influence eating behaviors in adolescents. J Pediatr Nurs 2005;20:258-67.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:617-27.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Chou SP, Huang B, Goldstein R, Grant BF. Temporal associations between physical illnesses and mental disorders – Results from the Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Compr Psychiatry 2013;54:627-38.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Baran S, Teul I, Lorkowski J. The level of distress as an indicator of mental health of university students. Ann Acad Med Stetin 2012;58:17-21.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Bromet E, Andrade LH, Hwang I, Sampson NA, Alonso J, de Girolamo G, et al. Cross-national epidemiology of DSM-IV major depressive episode. BMC Med 2011;9:90.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Smith AP, Miles C. The effects of lunch on cognitive vigilance tasks. Ergonomics 1986;29:1251-61.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Smith A, Leekam S, Ralph A, McNeill G. The influence of meal composition on post-lunch changes in performance efficiency and mood. Appetite 1988;10:195-203.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Samieri C, Jutand MA, Féart C, Capuron L, Letenneur L, Barberger-Gateau P. Dietary patterns derived by hybrid clustering method in older people: Association with cognition, mood, and self-rated health. J Am Diet Assoc 2008;108:1461-71.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Ross CE. Overweight and depression. J Health Soc Behav 1994;35:63-79.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Gibson EL. Emotional influences on food choice: Sensory, physiological and psychological pathways. Physiol Behav 2006;89:53-61.  Back to cited text no. 57
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Previous article  Next article
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed868    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded123    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal