Prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients in Isfahan, Iran
Hamid Kalantari1, Faezeh Ferdowsi2, Majid Yaran3
1 Department of Gastroenterology, Isfahan Liver Disease Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
|Date of Submission||26-Jun-2014|
|Date of Acceptance||09-Mar-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||26-Sep-2016|
Prof. Hamid Kalantari
Department of Gastroenterology, Isfahan Liver Disease Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: The absence of a detectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) with or without hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) or hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) in the presence of hepatitis B virus-DNA (HBV-DNA) is defined as occult HBV infection. This study was aimed to evaluate the prevalence of occult HBV infection in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) in Isfahan, Iran.
Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study was done on 400 patients without acute or chronic HBV infection with end-stage renal disease undergoing regular HD. Blood samples were collected prior to the HD session, and serological markers of viral hepatitis B included HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HBc were measured using standard third generation commercially avail-able enzyme immunoassays kit, then samples of positive anti-HBc and negative anti-HBs were tested for HBV DNA using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction techniques. Data were analyzed by SPSS using t-test and Chi-square test.
Results: The mean age of patients was 51.6 ± 11.2 years. Anti-HBc positive was observed in 32 (8%) of 400 studied patients with negative HBsAg. Of 32 patients with anti-HBc positive, 15 were males and 17 were females with mean age of 49.7 ± 12.6 years. Among 32 patients with anti-HBc positive, 10 patients were negative for anti-HBs. All of 10 patients were negative for HBV DNA. The prevalence of occult HBV infection was 0%.
Conclusions: The prevalence of occult HBV infection in HBsAg negative patients undergoing HD was 0% and look to be among the lowest worldwide. So, occult HBV infection is not a significant health problem in HD patients in this region.
Keywords: Hemodialysis, hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis B surface antibody, hepatitis B virus DNA, occult hepatitis B
|How to cite this article:|
Kalantari H, Ferdowsi F, Yaran M. Prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients in Isfahan, Iran. Adv Biomed Res 2016;5:151
|How to cite this URL:|
Kalantari H, Ferdowsi F, Yaran M. Prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients in Isfahan, Iran. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Jan 22];5:151. Available from: http://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2016/5/1/151/188487
| Introduction|| |
The risk for infection in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients because of the process of HD requires vascular access for prolonged periods is high. Surveillance for infections associated with chronic HD has always focused on viral hepatitis. The morbidity and mortality of these infections in the dialysis population is difficult to quantify. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the most well-known and important causes of liver disease in these patients.,, In HD centers, HBV infection rates have significantly reduced after the introduction of HBV vaccine, the isolation strategy for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients, the discovery of erythropoietin, and the implementation of infection control measures. Recently, it is reported that the prevalence rates of HBV infection in HD facilities seem to concur more closely with the general population.
Occult HBV infection is defined as the absence of a detectable HBsAg with or without hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) or hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) in the presence of HBV-DNA. Among HD patients occult HBV infection is also highly prevalent, those undergoing frequent blood transfusions, blood donors, and intravenous drug users.,,,,
The prevalence of occult HBV infection is related to the overall prevalence of HBV infection in the general population. In published reports in HBsAg negative patients on HD the prevalence of occult HBV infection ranges between 0% and 58%,,,,, whereas in a North American population was reported to be 3.7%, in India, population was reported to be 4.9%, in Italy was reported ranges between 0% and 26.6% in two cohorts,, and in Turkey prevalence rates of 2.7% and 12.4% have been reported., In a study in Iranian HD patients with isolated anti-HBc, the HBV-DNA was detectable in 50% of these patients.
Variations in the prevalence of HBV infection among countries, the size and virological features of the study groups and sensitivity of molecular techniques are among the probable causes of the different frequencies of occult HBV infection in HD patients. Furthermore, the prevalence rate of HBV reported different based on geographic heterogeneity worldwide, and prevalence is especially heterogeneous across Iran. Iran is an area of low endemicity (the carrier rate in low endemicity areas is less than 2% and less than 20% of the population is infected with HBV) and despite the potential clinical importance of occult HBV infection; data about the prevalence of occult HBV infection among Iranian patients undergoing HD is limited. So, the present study was aimed to investigate the prevalence of occult HBV infection in patients receiving HD at a single center in Isfahan, Iran.
| Materials and Methods|| |
In this cross-sectional study a total of 400 patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing regular HD from nephrology and dialysis units in Kashani, Faiz and Al-Zahra Hospitals in Isfahan, Iran were included between July and January, 2013. This study was investigated and approved by the ethics committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Patients undergoing HD for at least 6 months in both genders without acute or chronic HBV infection, no history of other liver disease and other risk factors such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were eligible. Furthermore, patients who were being treated with interferon and/or ribavirin and who had family history of HBV infection were not included. After that participating subjects were explained about the purposes of the study written informed consent was obtained.
Collected information were included age, sex, history of previous transfusion, duration of dialysis, tattooing history, history of renal transplantation, history of diabetes mellitus, HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc which were evaluated in studied subjects.
Prior to the HD session, blood samples were collected, centrifuged immediately, and the sera were separated, aliquoted, and then stored at −20°C until use. Serological markers of viral hepatitis B (HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc) were measured using standard third generation commercially avail-able enzyme immunoassays kit (Diapro, Milano, Italy). Also, samples from patient with positive anti-HBc and negative anti-HBs were tested for HBV DNA using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction techniques (Diapro, Milano, Italy) with specific prime and probes.
The sample size was calculated with two-sided log-rank test, α = 0.05, and 80% power. SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to managed and analyzed the collected data. Descriptive statistics are reported as mean ± standard deviation, median [interquartile range] or number (percent) as appropriate. Independent sample t-test and Chi-square test were used to compare continues and categorical variables, respectively. The significance level was set at less than 0/05.
| Results|| |
Characteristics of study population are shown in [Table 1]. In this study, blood samples were obtained from 400 enrolled HD patients. The mean age of patients studied was 51.6 ± 11.2 years (range: 17–68). Of 400 patients studied, 234 (58.5%) were male and 166 (41.5%) were female. Most of the patients had history of transfusion; nearly 10% of patients reported history of renal transplantation and 33% had diabetes mellitus. In all 400 patients studied, anti-HBc positive was observed in 8% of patients (32 of 400) with negative HBsAg. As shown in [Table 1] among 32 patients with anti-HBc positive, 15 were males and 17 were females. The mean age was 49.7 ± 12.6 years and the mean dialysis period was 51.3 + 35.6 months. Patients with anti-HBc positive were younger with higher dialysis period than in all patients (51.6 years and 49.1 months). Of anti-HBc positive patients 84% had history of transfusion, 12% had diabetes mellitus and history of renal transplantation was not observed in these patients.
Frequency of various combinations of HBV markers are detailed in [Table 2]. Among 32 patients with anti-HBc positive, 10 patients were negative for anti-HBs and 22 patients were positive. HBV DNA was assessed in patients with anti-HBs negative and results showed that all of 10 patients were negative for HBV DNA. Therefore the prevalence of occult HBV infection was 0 in studied patients with anti-HBc positive and anti-HBs negative.
| Discussion|| |
The prevalence of occult HBV is unclear and varies significantly between different geographical regions. The world can be divided into three areas where the prevalence of chronic HBV infection is >8% (high endemicity), 2–8% (intermediate endemicity), and <2% (low endemicity). The sensitivity of the HBsAg and DNA assays used and the prevalence of HBV infection in the study population are important factor to clear the prevalence of occult HBV., It is shown that the endemicity of HBV infection closely effect on the prevalence of occult HBV infection and patients are more likely to develop occult HBV infections in countries highly endemic for HBV and infrequently reported in low endemic areas.,, At the present Iran is classified as having a low endemicity for HBV infection. The present study showed that in studied HBsAg negative patients, the prevalence of anti-HBc positive was 20% but the rate of occult HBV infections was 0% in our study.
The prevalence of occult HBV infections reports ranges from 0% to 58% among patients in dialysis units in previous studies.,,,, In a study by Ramezani et al. of the 289 Iranian HD patients, 18 patients had isolated anti-HBc (6.2%), and the HBV-DNA was detectable in 50% of these patients (9 out of 18 patients). They reported the prevalence of occult HBV in these patients 3.1%. In a study by Gwak et al. 65.8% were anti-HBc positive and the prevalence of occult HBV infection was reported as 0% in HD patients in Korea. In a large cohort of Italian chronic dialysis patients isolated anti-HBc was reported to be 20.8% of HD patients also they found that occult HBV was absent in their study group. In Jardim et al. study the prevalence of occult HBV was 0% in 34 HD patients who were anti-HBc positive. In a study involving subjects from Turkey, occult hepatitis B infection was found in 2.7% of HD patients. In a survey in central Greece, the prevalence of occult HBV reported to be 0.9%. In Motta et al. study  in 100 HBsAg negative HD patients the presence of HBV-DNA was detected in 15% of samples. In other studies, the prevalence of occult HBV reported to be in Spain 58%, Canada 3.8%, Italy 0% and 26.6%, Turkey 0%, 1.2%, 12.4% and 16.9%,,,, Egypt 4.1% and in Brazil was reported to be 1.5%. The higher prevalence of isolated anti-HBc is seen in endemic countries such as South-East Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and Greece and HBV-DNA is detected in about 10% of subjects with anti-HBc alone, with a range between 0% and 22.8%, depending on the geographical area and population selected., Our results showed that in 400 HBsAg negative HD patients the presence of isolated anti-HBc was 8% and HBV-DNA was detected in 0% of these patients. As shown findings in present study is similar to some previous reports and also is dissimilar to some previous reports. These discrepancies in the rate of occult HBV infection in HD patients may reflect the diverse prevalence of HBV infection in different countries whereas Iran is classified as having a low endemicity for HBV infection and most of studies with similar results are done in countries with low endemicity of HBV infection and most of the high rates of occult HBV infection are shown in countries with high or intermediate endemicity of HBV infection. Other possible explanations of these discrepancies in the rate of occult HBV infection in HD patients include sensitivity of molecular biology techniques, size and virological features of the patient groups and the clinical specimens and specimen selection criteria for the HBVDNA tests. In our study the patients were selected for HBV-DNA assay if they had the positive anti-HBc result, and HBV DNA was not checked for anti HBc negative patients, this can be mention as the main limitation of the present study.
| Conclusions|| |
The prevalence of occult HBV infection in HBsAg negative patients undergoing HD at HD units was 0% and seems to be among the lowest worldwide. These results showed that occult HBV infection is not a significant health problem in HD patients in this region and quality of medical care and hygienic measures followed in HD units are appropriate for HD patients in Isfahan, Iran.
Financial support and sponsorship
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Elamin S, Abu-Aisha H. Prevention of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus transmission in hemodialysis centers: Review of current international recommendations. Arab J Nephrol Transplant 2011;4:35-47.
Johnson DW, Dent H, Yao Q, Tranaeus A, Huang CC, Han DS, et al.
Frequencies of hepatitis B and C infections among haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in Asia-Pacific countries: Analysis of registry data. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:1598-603.
Alavian SM, Bagheri-Lankarani K, Mahdavi-Mazdeh M, Nourozi S. Hepatitis B and C in dialysis units in Iran: Changing the epidemiology. Hemodial Int 2008;12:378-82.
Fabrizi F, Messa PG, Lunghi G, Aucella F, Bisegna S, Mangano S, et al.
Occult hepatitis B virus infection in dialysis patients: A multicentre survey. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;21:1341-7.
Wong PN, Fung TT, Mak SK, Lo KY, Tong GM, Wong Y, et al.
Hepatitis B virus infection in dialysis patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;20:1641-51.
Wasley A, Kruszon-Moran D, Kuhnert W, Simard EP, Finelli L, McQuillan G, et al.
The prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States in the era of vaccination. J Infect Dis 2010;202:192-201.
Burdick RA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Woods JD, Hedderwick SA, Kurokawa K, Combe C, et al.
Patterns of hepatitis B prevalence and seroconversion in hemodialysis units from three continents: The DOPPS. Kidney Int 2003;63:2222-9.
Hollinger FB, Habibollahi P, Daneshmand A, Alavian SM. Occult hepatitis B infection in chronic hemodialysis patients: Current concepts and strategy. Hepat Mon 2010;10:199-204.
Fang Y, Shang QL, Liu JY, Li D, Xu WZ, Teng X, et al.
Prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection among hepatopathy patients and healthy people in China. J Infect 2009;58:383-8.
Georgiadou SP, Zachou K, Liaskos C, Gabeta S, Rigopoulou EI, Dalekos GN. Occult hepatitis B virus infection in patients with autoimmune liver diseases. Liver Int 2009;29:434-42.
Ramezani A, Banifazl M, Eslamifar A, Aghakhani A. Serological pattern of anti-HBc alone infers occult hepatitis B virus infection in high-risk individuals in Iran. J Infect Dev Ctries 2010;4:658-61.
Shire NJ, Rouster SD, Rajicic N, Sherman KE. Occult hepatitis B in HIV-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004;36:869-75.
Tamori A, Hayashi T, Shinzaki M, Kobayashi S, Iwai S, Enomoto M, et al.
Frequent detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in hepatocellular carcinoma of patients with sustained virologic response for hepatitis C virus. J Med Virol 2009;81:1009-14.
Yoo JH, Hwang SG, Yang DH, Son MS, Kwon CI, Ko KH, et al.
Prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients. Korean J Gastroenterol 2013;61:209-14.
Oesterreicher C, Hammer J, Koch U, Pfeffel F, Sunder-Plassmann G, Petermann D, et al.
HBV and HCV genome in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1995;48:1967-71.
Minuk GY, Sun DF, Greenberg R, Zhang M, Hawkins K, Uhanova J, et al.
Occult hepatitis B virus infection in a North American adult hemodialysis patient population. Hepatology 2004;40:1072-7.
Cabrerizo M, Bartolomé J, Caramelo C, Barril G, Carreno V. Molecular analysis of hepatitis B virus DNA in serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from hepatitis B surface antigen-negative cases. Hepatology 2000;32:116-23.
Cohen GA, Goffinet JA, Donabedian RK, Conn HO. Observations on decreased serum glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (SGOT) activity in azotemic patients. Ann Intern Med 1976;84:275-80.
Jain P, Nijhawan S. Occult hepatitis C virus infection is more common than hepatitis B infection in maintenance hemodialysis patients. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:2288-9.
Di Stefano M, Volpe A, Stallone G, Tartaglia L, Prato R, Martinelli D, et al.
Occult HBV infection in hemodialysis setting is marked by presence of isolated antibodies to HBcAg and HCV. J Nephrol 2009;22:381-6.
Yakaryilmaz F, Gurbuz OA, Guliter S, Mert A, Songur Y, Karakan T, et al.
Prevalence of occult hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections in Turkish hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail 2006;28:729-35.
Altindiş M, Uslan I, Cetinkaya Z, Yüksel S, Ciftçi IH, Demirtürk N, et al
. Investigation of hemodialysis patients in terms of the presence of occult hepatitis B. Mikrobiyol Bul 2007;41:227-33.
Aghakhani A, Banifazl M, Kalantar E, Eslamifar A, Ahmadi F, Razeghi E, et al.
Occult hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients with isolated hepatitis B core antibody: A multicenter study. Ther Apher Dial 2010;14:349-53.
Ramezani A, Banifazl M, Aghakhani A. Occult hepatitis B infection in chronic hemodialysis patients: Comparison of results and concepts: Occult HBV in chronic hemodialysis patients. Hepat Mon 2011;11:128-9.
Schmeltzer P, Sherman KE. Occult hepatitis B: Clinical implications and treatment decisions. Dig Dis Sci 2010;55:3328-35.
Hollinger FB. Hepatitis B virus infection and transfusion medicine: Science and the occult. Transfusion 2008;48:1001-26.
Zervou EK, Dalekos GN, Boumba DS, Tsianos EV. Value of anti-HBc screening of blood donors for prevention of HBV infection: Results of a 3-year prospective study in Northwestern Greece. Transfusion 2001;41:652-8.
Bréchot C, Thiers V, Kremsdorf D, Nalpas B, Pol S, Paterlini-Bréchot P. Persistent hepatitis B virus infection in subjects without hepatitis B surface antigen: Clinically significant or purely “occult”? Hepatology 2001;34:194-203.
Chemin I, Trépo C. Clinical impact of occult HBV infections. J Clin Virol 2005;34:15-21.
Alavian SM, Ahmadzad-Asl M, Kabir A, Bagheri-Lankarani K. Hepatitis B virus infection in Iran: A systematic review. Hepat Mon 2008;8:281-94.
Gwak GY, Huh W, Lee DH, Min BH, Koh KC, Kim JJ, et al.
Occult hepatitis B virus infection in chronic hemodialysis patients in Korea. Hepatogastroenterology 2008;55:1721-4.
Jardim RN, Gonçales NS, Pereira JS, Fais VC, Gonçales Junior FL. Occult hepatitis B virus infection in immunocompromised patients. Braz J Infect Dis 2008;12:300-5.
Mina P, Georgiadou SP, Rizos C, Dalekos GN, Rigopoulou EI. Prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection in haemodialysis patients from central Greece. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:225-31.
Motta JS, Mello FC, Lago BV, Perez RM, Gomes SA, Figueiredo FF. Occult hepatitis B virus infection and lamivudine-resistant mutations in isolates from renal patients undergoing hemodialysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;25:101-6.
Cabrerizo M, Bartolomé J, De Sequera P, Caramelo C, Carreño V. Hepatitis B virus DNA in serum and blood cells of hepatitis B surface antigen-negative hemodialysis patients and staff. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997;8:1443-7.
Goral V, Okzul H, Tekes S, Sit D, Kadiroglu AK. Prevalence of occult HBV infection in haemodialysis patients with chronic HCV. World J Gastroenterol 2006;7:3420-4.
Ersoy O, Yilmaz R, Arici M, Turgan C, Bayraktar Y. Prevalence of occult hepatitis B infection in hemodialysis patients. Dial Transplant 2008;37:362-8.
Sav T, Gursoy S, Torun E, Sav NM, Unal A, Oymak O, et al.
Occult HBV infection in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients. Ren Fail 2010;32:74-7.
Abu El Makarem MA, Abdel Hamid M, Abdel Aleem A, Ali A, Shatat M, Sayed D, et al
. Prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients from egypt with or without hepatitis C virus infection. Hepat Mon 2012;12:253-8.
Albuquerque AC, Coelho MR, Lemos MF, Moreira RC. Occult hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients in Recife, State of Pernambuco, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2012;45:558-62.
Pondé RA, Cardoso DD, Ferro MO. The underlying mechanisms for the 'anti-HBc alone' serological profile. Arch Virol 2010;155:149-58.
Grob P, Jilg W, Bornhak H, Gerken G, Gerlich W, Günther S, et al.
Serological pattern “anti-HBc alone”: Report on a workshop. J Med Virol 2000;62:450-5.
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||¿Cuándo puede ser útil buscar VHB oculto en pacientes en hemodiálisis?
| ||Rosa María Ruiz-Calero Cendrero,Bárbara Cancho Castellano,María Victoria Martín Hidalgo-Barquero,María Cruz Cid Parra,Josefa Galán González,María Antonia Fernández Solís,Olga Sánchez García |
| ||Nefrología. 2019; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Systematic review and meta-analysis of HIV, HBV and HCV infection prevalence in Sudan
| ||M. M. Badawi,M. S. Atif,Y. Y. Mustafa |
| ||Virology Journal. 2018; 15(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Occult Hepatitis B Infection in Hepatitis C Patients with Hematological Disorders
| ||Nematollah Jonaidi-Jafari,Mohammad Saeid Rezaee-Zavareh,Javad Tavallaei-Nosratabadi,Reza Ajudani,Mahdi Ramezani-Binabaj,Hamidreza Karimi-Sari,Morteza Izadi,Reza Ranjbar,Seyyed Mohammad Miri,Seyed Moayed Alavian |
| ||Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2016; In press(In press) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|