Histomorphometric effects of gemcitabine on Swiss albino mice spermatogenesis
S Viveka1, Ajay Udyavar2, Balakrishna Shetty2, Santhosh Kuriakose3, MJ Sudha4
1 Department of Anatomy, Azeezia Institute of Medical Sciences, Meeyannoor, Kollam, Kerala, India
2 Department of Anatomy, A.J. Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Anatomy, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala, India
4 Department of Pharmacology, Azeezia Institute of Medical Sciences, Meeyannoor, Kollam, Kerala, India
|Date of Submission||08-Jun-2013|
|Date of Acceptance||15-Feb-2014|
|Date of Web Publication||30-Jan-2015|
Department of Anatomy, Azeezia Institute of Medical Sciences, Meeyannoor, Kollam - 691 537, Kerala
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Spermatogenesis is a highly conserved and regulated process and it is sensitive to fluctuations in the physical and chemical environment. Gemcitabine is a novel antimetabolic anticancer drug used frequently in the treatment of many cancers. This study aimed to investigate the histomorphometric effects of gemcitabine on spermatogenesis in Swiss albino mice.
Materials and Methods: Gemcitabine in high and low doses (80 and 40 mg/kg) injected intraperitoneally to inbred Swiss albino mice. Gross testicular features and seminiferous tubular histomorphometry was studies at the end of 7 th , 14 th day and at 2 months sperm shape abnormalities were studied.
Results: Seminiferous tubular morphology was altered significantly, showing a reduction in height, perimeter and area in a dose dependent manner. Sertoli cell number decreased. Basement membrane thickness was reduced and it appeared to be permanent, with statistically insignificant changes even after 2 months. There was a reduction of intertubular spaces. Sperms have shown banana heading, decapitation and loss of normal hook of head. The effects were partially reversible at the end of 2 months.
Conclusion: It was concluded that gemcitabine affects the process of spermatogenesis adversely in a dose and time dependent manner and the effects are partially reversible.
Keywords: Gemcitabine, seminiferous tubules, Sertoli cells, spermatogenesis, Swiss albino mice
|How to cite this article:|
Viveka S, Udyavar A, Shetty B, Kuriakose S, Sudha M J. Histomorphometric effects of gemcitabine on Swiss albino mice spermatogenesis. Adv Biomed Res 2015;4:29
|How to cite this URL:|
Viveka S, Udyavar A, Shetty B, Kuriakose S, Sudha M J. Histomorphometric effects of gemcitabine on Swiss albino mice spermatogenesis. Adv Biomed Res [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Mar 29];4:29. Available from: http://www.advbiores.net/text.asp?2015/4/1/29/150423
| Introduction|| |
Progressive division and differentiation of spermatogonia in seminiferous tubules and production of spermatozoa constitutes spermatogenesis. Seminiferous tubules are composed of supporting somatic cells (Sertoli cells) and germ cells (spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatids). Spermatogenesis has in three phases. The process of mitotic division of primary spermatogonia referred as spermatocytogenesis. Second phase is of reductional (meiotic) division. This is followed by a phase of differentiation of spermatozoa called spermiogenesis.  This process is highly sensitive to fluctuations in the physical and chemical environment.  List of chemicals affecting the sperm production is increasing day by day. As the gametogenesis involves rapid division of cells, drugs especially acting on the cell cycle have adverse effects on it. Chemotherapeutic agents have been shown to have lethal effects on the actively dividing cells involved in spermatogenesis. During "S" phase of the cell cycle, replicating deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is susceptible to damage. Purine and puramidine analogs get incorporated in DNA and prevent normal synthesis of genetic material and thereby altering normal cell division. ,, The anticancer drug, gemcitabine being a fluorinated nucleoside analog can arrest DNA replication and hence used in the treatment of various carcinomas, including small cell carcinoma lung, breast cancer and pancreatic cancer. As the drug affects not only rapid dividing cells of the tumor, but also normal dividing cells, it can be expected to result in myelosuppresion. ,
| Materials and methods|| |
Total 40 inbred adult Swiss albino male mice were subjected into the study, dividing them into three experimental G1, G2 and G-late, of 10 each and a control group having 10. Mice were fed on standard feed and hosted in a 12 h night day cycle environment and allowed water ad libitum. Optimum temperatures maintained throughout the experiment. The procedures and the handling of the mice were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use committee. All mice received humane care in compliance with the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals.
Intraperitoneal gemcitabine of 40 mg/kg and 80 mg/kg administered to the experimental G1 and G2, respectively. It has been shown that in mice, gemcitabine lethal dose is 333 mg/kg. A dose 1/8 th of it is selected as a baseline for group G1 mice and half of it is selected for group G2 mice in order to get maximum effects of the drug.  Control group mice were treated with intraperitoneal saline. After 7 days, the half the mice from each group were sacrificed by sodium pentobarbital injection and testis with epididymis were dissected out. The G-late group got 40 mg/kg of gemcitabine and half the mice were sacrificed at the end of 30 days and the rest at the end of 60 days. Their testes were studied in order to observe the reversibility of the effects.
Gross features of testis were noted. The specimens were fixed with Bouins' solution. Semen was milked out of the epididymis and vas deferens - smears were prepared.
Gemcitabine hydrochloride (Gemita lyophilized) is procured from Fresenius Kabi Oncology Ltd. It was reconstituted with distilled water as recommended by the manufacturer (10 ml/vial). The whole reconstituted drug was used for the study at once, within 24 h, in order to maintain the potency of the reconstituted drug. Any unused reconstituted drug is discarded. The reconstituted drug was taken in insulin syringe and administered intraperitoneally.
The mice testis with epididymis was fixed using Bouin's solution (prepared using 75 ml of picric acid and 25 ml of 10% formalin) for 24 h. Fixed specimens are sectioned at 3-5 μm thickness using a microtome and standard hematoxylin and eosin staining done. The slides thus prepared were observed under the morphometric microscope and analyzed using Jenoptik Optical Systems Digital morphometry microscope, Business Unit Digital Imaging, Goeschwitser Str. 25, 07745 Jena, Germany. Software used: ProgRes ® Capture Pro 2.7 release 003.
Three non-serial testicular sections were used for the morphometric analysis and in each section 10 tubules were quantified, adding to 30 tubules per animal. The following parameters were analyzed and tabulated. The seminiferous tubular dimensions and epithelial cell height were studied.
All data observed were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and statistical significance of the histomorphometric data observed was performed by one-way ANOVA and Student's t-test (P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant).
| Results|| |
There was significant weight loss of testis in G1 and G2 group both at 7 and 14 days in comparison to control group. G-late group showed a significant increase of weight at the end of 2 months in comparison mice groups studied at 7 and 14 days. All parameters noted are tabulated in [Table 1]. There was statistically no difference between the control group (119.3 ± 11.4) and G-late group (117.7 ± 10.5) in terms of weight of testis. There was decreased visible vascularity of the tunica albuginea over testis.
|Table 1: Tabulation of gross testicular features, histomorphometric parameters of seminiferous tubules and sperm shape abnormalities in control, G1 and G2 groups at the end of 14 days (for consideration of acute effects of drug) and in G‑late group at the end of 2 months (for considering reversibility of effects of drug)|
Click here to view
The seminiferous tubular histomorphometry
Normal histoarchitecture appreciated in control group [Figure 1]. G1 and G2 showed a significant decrease in diameter perimeter and area of the seminiferous tubules both at 7 and 14 days (P < 0.01). The seminiferous epithelial height in the control group was 74.41 ± 10.9 μ. In the group treated with drug, the epithelium was reduced to a single layer in few of the tubules [Figure 2]. The epithelial height in G1 and G2 at the end of 7 days were 33.74 ± 3.02 μ and 29.72 ± 5.53 μ, respectively. The reduction was highly significant (P < 0.01). The spermatogenic cells were detached from the basement membrane. Spermatogenic activity was halted. Intraepithelial bleb noted [Figure 3]. The sperms in some of the tubules (especially in mice exposed to acute effects of higher dose of gemcitabine, as in G2 group after 7 days) had clumped to a corner [Figure 4]. In later stages when the effects of the drug wear off (in G1 group after 14 days) spermatogenic cells filled the entire lumen of the tubule. In both group at the end of 14 days - spermatogenic cells showed intense nuclear hyperchromatism. Differentiation of primary and secondary spermatogonia was not possible.
|Figure 1: Seminiferous epithelium, control mice, H and E, high magnification|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Screen shot of the measurement of seminiferous tubular dimensions using morphometric microscope and ProgRes Software, ×40|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Seminiferous tubule from G2 at 7 days, showing intraepithelial bleb, H and E, ×40|
Click here to view
|Figure 4: Seminiferous tubule from G1 at 7 days, showing marked decrease in the tubular dimensions, with epithelium virtually reduced to single layer and sperms clumped to a corner|
Click here to view
There was thinning out of basement membrane in mice treated with drug during initial days (8.13 μ in control vs. 2.55 μ in G1 group, P < 0.01). Sertoli cell nuclear dimensions were also reduced in G1 and G2 mice at 7 and 14 days [Table 1]. G-late group showed a significant increase in seminiferous epithelial height, diameter, perimeter and areas of cut section of seminiferous tubules in comparison to mice administered with drug at 7 and 14 days. The area of seminiferous tubules in control and G-late groups were 33345.2 and 17977.5 μ2 respectively (P > 0.1). The seminiferous tubular cytoarchitectural observations of G-late group were almost similar to control group. The sequential changes in the seminiferous epithelial height are shown [Figure 5]. Basement thickness and Sertoli cell nuclear dimensions were similar to control group mice. Gemcitabine has resulted in a dose and time dependent statistically significant decrease in the mean height of seminiferous epithelium and the effects are reversible, though not completely.
|Figure 5: Representation of mean and standard deviation of seminiferous tubular height in the groups studied, shows sequential increase in the seminiferous epithelial height with decrease in dose and increasing time|
Click here to view
Sperm shape abnormalities
The sperms from the G1 and G2 group showed several abnormalities: Lack of usual hook, banana such as head, amorphous head, folded sperms, bent head, bent neck, decapitated sperms and vacuole in the sperm head.
| Discussion|| |
The testis has very active prosurvival and proapoptotic systems that work together to regulate the extent of germ cell apoptosis. The germ cell proliferation is tightly regulated system of physiological apoptosis optimizing the output to a level sustainable by the seminiferous epithelium. Apoptosis will be markedly increased after exposure to toxic insult, indicating that the seminiferous epithelium is dysfunctional with suboptimal support.  The seminiferous tubular epithelium may recover if the toxicant is not too severe or exposure is for short duration.
The drug has resulted in decrease in weight of mice testis. The magnitude of the loss of weight in the group treated with therapeutic dosage of gemcitabine is up to 15% and 27%, respectively at the end of 7 and 14 days. There is statistically significant reversible decrease in weight of the animal immediately after the administration of the drug, accounted by its acute toxic effect on the mucosa of digestive tract; recovery of which leads to subsequent sequential increment in weight of the animal. Similar reduction in the combined weight of testis and epididymis is noted with decrease in its visible vascularity; the acute toxic effect of the drug on the endothelium of the vessels possibly decrease the blood supply to the testis and resulted in gross decrease in its weight. Similar alterations in the weight are also reported by Meistrich et al., in their experiment where they have observed the effect of 14 different toxics on mice testis and spermatogenesis.  Chemotherapeutics in particular, being very active against actively dividing cells, have more effect on spermatogenesis and in turn weight of testis.  Similar and comparable decrease in the weight of mice at the end of 5 th week is reported using vincristine sulfate. 
It has been conclusively shown in this study that gemcitabine arrest the normal spermatogenesis at early stage (primary spermatocytic cycle) in majority of the seminiferous tubule as evidenced by the significant decrease in the seminiferous tubular dimensions, decrease in the seminiferous epithelial height and by morphological changes in the spermatogenic cells. The effects are dose and time dependent. As the mice exposed to the supranormal dose shown statistically significant more disruption of seminiferous tubular morphology than the mice exposed to therapeutic dose. Similar dose dependent decrease in the spermatocytic activity is reported using 14 various mutagens on mice.  The changes in the spermatogenic cells have been observed by various authors using array of toxic chemicals, ranging from heavy metals to the modern day most sophisticated chemotherapeutic agents, from plant extracts to physical constraints like prolonged hypoxia on testis. Most of the studies do correlate with human beings in that comparable effects can be seen in humans naturally exposed to these chemical and physical agents. Gemcitabine being a deoxycytidine analog requires an intracytoplasmic phosphorylation to convert to active gemcitabine-nucleotides, gemcitabine 2',2'- difluoro 2'- deoxycytidine diphosphate and gemcitabine 2',2'-difluoro 2'- deoxycytidine triphosphate, which in turn inhibit DNA synthesis. This possibly explains the arrest of the spermatogonial cells in the early stages of meiosis where DNA synthesis has to occur; and to a lesser extent to the formation of relatively unstained crescents surrounding the chromatin, perceived as perinuclear halo in the histology.
In the present study, the spermatogenic cells have been reduced to single layer, showing complete halt of spermatogenesis. In most of the tubules studied from the G2 and G1 mice testis the spermatogenetic halt was evident by reduced epithelial cell height and lack of sperms in the lumen. Injection of imatinib mesylate to mice gives similar results, in less than 2 weeks.  Decrease in epithelial height reported after injection of doxorubicin to mice.  As the meiosis in most of the germ cells have halted in early stage, in this study it was not possible to differentiate the primary and secondary spermatocytes in most of the tubules during acute phase of the drug administration.
The detachment of spermatogenic cells from the basement membrane, if preparation artifacts are effectively removed, will indicate an altered interaction with basement membrane. Similar kinds of alterations are also observed after use of many anticancer drugs especially reported with mitomycin C. , Appearance of intraepithelial vacuolations may be due to intraepithelial edema and altered intercellular connections, due to acute cytological toxicity of the drug used. Similar intraepithelial vacuolations are reported in mice treated with Neem extract,  Brahmi leaves  and diazacholesteroldihydrochloride.  Occasional such intraepithelial vacuolations are observed in the current study [Figure 3].
Clumping of the sperms inside the seminiferous tubules are the indication of halt of normal spermatogenesis, loss of junctional complexes between the adjacent Sertoli cells, mitochondrial membrane damage, plasma membrane damage with profound disturbances in the membrane functions of spermatozoa in the lumen as a result of hypoxic and hyponutritive environments prevailing in the seminiferous tubules under the influence of the drug. Aggregates of sperms are well-documented in many mice spermatogenesis studies. ,,
All the abnormalities observed have undergone statistically significant reversal after 30 and 60 days interval. Though the seminiferous tubular morphology has regained near normal morphology, there exists statistically significant difference with the control group. The wearing effect of the drug and recovery of spermatocytic cells from acute toxic effects of the drug, may account for such a recovery. The permanent loss of spermatogonial stem cells may explain lack of complete recovery.
Though it has shown that spermatogenesis is inhibited in most initial stages, the cells which are already recruited in the process showed some structural alterations in sperms such as hookless, banana shaped, amorphous, folded sperms, bent heads. Significant number of sperms ware decapitated. Misshapen sperm count is dose and time dependent. The highest mean values of total abnormal sperm and most other kinds of abnormalities were in G2 at 7 th day. The proportion of misshapen sperm may be influenced by genetic background.  According to human data, gemcitabine resulted in moderate to severe hypospermatogenesis, decreased number fertility reversible.  Animal data also found that the drug resulted in decreasing spermatogenesis and fertility in male albino mice.  It is plausible that gemcitabine causes structural chromosomal aberrations in spermatozoa of treated animals these chromosomal abnormalities reflect on sperm head morphologies. ,
The increases in the fractions of abnormal sperm shapes, specifically to hookless and banana headed types is probably due to the disruptive effect of gemcitabine on the DNA synthesis. This leads to changes in differentiation during gene expression, including later steps of transcription and translation of the genetic message.
| Conclusion|| |
With this study it is concluded that the spermatogenesis is highly regulated and conserved process. Gemcitabine even in therapeutic doses adversely affects the process of sperm production and caution is advised during administration of drug for reproductively active males. There is significant reversal of adverse effects caused by the drug in 2 months of duration after a single therapeutic dose administration in mice.
| Acknowledgment|| |
Dr. Ramakrishna Avadhani, Prof and Head, Department of Anatomy, Yenepoya Medical College, Mangalore, Dr. Seethalakshmi, Professor, Department of Pharmacology, A J Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Dr. Mohandas Rai, Prof and Head, Department of Pharmacology, A J Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore.
| References|| |
Song GS. Could sperm quality be affected by a building environment? A literature review. Build Environ 2010;45:936-43.
Pizzorno G, Handschumacher RE, Cheng YC. Pyrimidine and purine antimetabolites. In: Bast RC Jr, Kufe DW, Pollock RE, Editors. Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine. 6 th
ed. Hamilton, ON: BC Decker; 2003.
Konishi H, Nagai K. Expression of nucleoside transporters in the mouse testis and ovary. Am J Biochem Biotechnol 2013;6:448-52.
Sigman M, Mehta A. Chemotherapy effects on spermatogenesis. In: Mulhall JP, Applegarth LD, Oates RD, Schlegel PN, editors. Impact of Cancers and Treatment on Male Fertility. London: Cambridge University: Health and Fitness; 2013. p. 114-5.
Takimoto CH, Calvo E. Principles of oncologic pharmacotherapy. In: Pazdur R, Wagman LD, Camphausen KA, Hoskins WJ, editors. Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 11 th
ed. CMP Medica 2008.
Abu-Baker SO. Gemcitabine impacts histological structure of mice testis and embryonic organs. Pak J Biol Sci 2009;12:607-15.
Gemcitabine, USP DI. Vol 1, Drug information for health care professional [Update monographs], Englewood, Colorador, Micromedex, Inc, 1999.
Boekelheide K. Mechanisms of toxic damage to spermatogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005; 34:6-8.
Meistrich ML, Finch M, da Cunha MF, Hacker U, Au WW. Damaging effects of fourteen chemotherapeutic drugs on mouse testis cells. Cancer Res 1982;42:122-31.
Russell LD, Russell JA. Short-term morphological response of the rat testis to administration of five chemotherapeutic agents. Am J Anat 1991;192:142-68.
Avadhani R, Kumar A. Sperm shape abnormalities in mice treated with vincristine sulphate. J Int Med Sci Acad 1994;7:9-13.
Adler ID. Synopsis of the in vivo
results obtained with the 10 known or suspected aneugens tested in the CEC collaborative study. Mutat Res 1993;287:131-7.
Prasad AM, Ramnarayan K, Bairy KL. Effect of imatinib on histological parameters in male Swiss albino mice. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 2010;4:116-22.
Hacker-Klom UB, Meistrich ML, Göhde W. Effect of doxorubicin and 4'-epi-doxorubicin on mouse spermatogenesis. Mutat Res 1986;160:39-46.
Ficsor G, Ginsberg LC. The effect of hydroxyurea and mitomycin C on sperm motility in mice. Mutat Res 1980;70:383-7.
Nakagawa S, Nakamura N, Fujioka M, Mori C. Spermatogenic cell apoptosis induced by mitomycin C in the mouse testis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1997;147:204-13.
Mishra RK, Singh SK. Effect of aqueous leaf extract of Azadirachta indica
on the reproductive organs in male mice. Indian J Exp Biol 2005;43:1093-103.
Singh A, Singh SK. Evaluation of antifertility potential of Brahmi in male mouse. Contraception 2009;79:71-9.
Singh SK, Chakravarty S. Antispermatogenic and antifertility effects of 20,25-diazacholesterol dihydrochloride in mice. Reprod Toxicol 2003;17:37-44.
Meistrich ML. Relationship between spermatogonial stem cell survival and testis function after cytotoxic therapy. Br J Cancer Suppl 1986;7:89-101.
Jagetia GC, Krishnamurthy H, Jyothi P. Evaluation of cytotoxic effects of different doses of vinblastine on mouse spermatogenesis by flow cytometry. Toxicology 1996;112:227-36.
Styrna J, Kilarski W, Krzanowska H. Influence of the CBA genetic background on sperm morphology and fertilization efficiency in mice with a partial Y chromosome deletion. Reproduction 2003;126:579-88.
Company, Elli Lilly. Material Safety Data Sheet. Section 11 Toxicological Information, 2005. Available from: http://www.web.ncifcrf.gov/rtp/LASP/intra/forms/msds/msds_Gemcitabine.pdf. [Last cited on 2009 Sep 02].
Viville S, Mollard R, Bach ML, Falquet C, Gerlinger P, Warter S. Do morphological anomalies reflect chromosomal aneuploidies? Case report. Hum Reprod 2000;15: 2563-6.
Hermo L, Pelletier RM, Cyr DG, Smith CE. Surfing the wave, cycle, life history, and genes/proteins expressed by testicular germ cells. Part 1: Background to spermatogenesis, spermatogonia, and spermatocytes. Microsc Res Tech 2010;73:241-78.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]